To: J. Neil Schulman
It doesn't matter whether he did it or not. He was not convicted beyond a reasonable doubt. Therefore he is not guilty and a great injustice has been done, regardless of what actually happened.
I swear some people on Free Republic are bloodthirsty. From members condoning prison rape to unjustly throwing people into jail for the rest of their life.
47 posted on
11/30/2004 10:54:22 AM PST by
FoxPro
(jroehl2@yahoo.com)
To: FoxPro
He was not convicted beyond a reasonable doubt I guess you didn't hear the verdict.
54 posted on
11/30/2004 10:58:39 AM PST by
Rodney King
(No, we can't all just get along)
To: FoxPro
He was not convicted beyond a reasonable doubt. Therefore he is not guilty and a great injustice has been done, regardless of what actually happened.Huh? Not convicted beyond a reasonable doubt? What does that mean? Apparently the jury believed that there wasn't any reasonable doubt.
57 posted on
11/30/2004 11:00:40 AM PST by
.38sw
To: FoxPro
>It doesn't matter whether he did it or not. He was not >convicted beyond a reasonable doubt. Therefore he is not >guilty and a great injustice has been done, regardless of >what actually happened.
I think the big statement here is IN YOUR OPINION. 12 people (who matter) obviously disagree with you.
146 posted on
11/30/2004 12:43:58 PM PST by
sandbar
To: FoxPro
I swear some people on Free Republic are bloodthirsty. Indeed. They seem determined to prove that Lefist caricatures of conservatives as "mouth-foaming sadists" are true.
Sadly, these "FR caricature conservatives" reflect poorly on the more rational conservatives among us. It's one of the reasons I've come to call myself a libertarian -- they're more cool and rational.
To: FoxPro
Yeah, I think he should get off so he and O.J. can search for the real murderers.
357 posted on
12/02/2004 1:49:35 AM PST by
Alaska Wolf
(Trained by English Setters)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson