Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: sodpoodle
Well, then, by all means, let's just convict everyone a prosecutor deems guilty. No need for a jury at all. No need to hold a jury to "beyond reasonable doubt."

Gratuitous? I don't think so. It's a simple fact that too often, folks ignore. Just like you apparently do.

127 posted on 11/30/2004 12:10:23 PM PST by DK Zimmerman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies ]


To: DK Zimmerman

You made a sweeping generality about a group: "PROSECUTORS" and assigned to them a very low level of integrity.

In your rebuttal to me you proceeded to dispense with a jury and its deliberation...followed by a derogatory comment about my ability to reason.

Please review your first and follow-up comments. You are quite deranged you know. That is not a generality or a stereotype. I am referring only to you DK Zimmerman.


132 posted on 11/30/2004 12:20:51 PM PST by sodpoodle (sparrows are underrated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson