Convicted By Suspicion -- Why Scott Peterson May Be Innocent

The Hollywood Investigator ^ | 11/30/2004 | J. Neil Schulman

[Darksheare]

Here's how CONCERNED Scott was about Laci and his unborn child:
At the prayer vigil for Laci, he was on the cellphone talking to his girlfriend.

[EllaMinnow]

Yeah, right.

[Darksheare]

I'm still waiting on some criminal defense lawyer to say Scott was convicted wrongly because the jury wasn't a jury of his 'pears'.
The jury wasn't full of wife-and-child murdering adulterous sleezebags.
I can just see Johnny Cochrane saying that.

[Tijeras_Slim]

Nice.... :)

[EllaMinnow]

Check it out...

http://www.pulpless.com/jneil/noframedex.html

[Tijeras_Slim]

He seems to be pro-gun, I'll give him that. (But that's all)

[EllaMinnow]

He's a strange one, to be sure. Do you think he'll grace us with his presence again?

[Tijeras_Slim]

Who knows where his ego will lead him?

[EllaMinnow]

Hopefully, to an orthodontist.

[Rodney King]

and that Geragos' motion to dismiss in the preliminary hearing is still unrefuted even as Scott Peterson's jury is considering whether or not to put him to death.

What do you mean that his motion is still unrefuted? Geragos made a motion and then judge just put it in his inbox and has forgotten about it?

[sissyjane]

I guess you don't know the meaning of circumstantial evidence, but most of the rest of us do.

Are you Justin Falconer?

[sissyjane]

There are no medical examiners in Contra Costa county, only Coroners.

How do I know?
I live in Contra Costa County.

He listed it as a homocide, which is the crime that Scott Peterson has been convicted of.
Get over it.

[sissyjane]

Luminol works when there is blood present, brightstar,but if one were strangled or smothered there would be no blood.

[blondee123]

That's my summation and I'm out of here again. I get it, you're really Scotts sister-in-law, Janey!!!

[blondee123]

My point I guess is there are thousands of murders in this country...that get hardly any pub. Why in the world did the MSM focus on this one....I'll never really know.

My theory as to why this one got so much attention, is Scotts own behavior after Laci went missing! His actions were not that of a husband & father to be. The way he acted brought more attention to the case than if he had just gone on TV like most family members do & plead for the return of his wife.

I hear a lot of TH's saying that it is because of Laci being so pretty & it being Christmas Eve, but I think that was only a small part of it, the intrigue started when Scotts own actions were so bizarre & then the annoucement by Amber (the other woman)!

[blondee123]

OMG, the WOLFMAN???

[Alaska Wolf]

Yeah, I think he should get off so he and O.J. can search for the real murderers.

[.38sw]

I, too, live in CoCo County. Mr. Shulman seems to think that a finding of homicide by a coroner is merely pro forma, and can't be relied upon. How interesting. If that were the case, we wouldn't have been able to convict murdered in this county. He doesn't seem to know or understand that coroners have the legal authority to make findings regarding the manner of deatah - findings that are legally defensible.

If there were no finding of homicide, then why didn't the judge just throw the case out of court, scold the prosecutors about wasting his time, apologize to Scott and then set him free?

[Rodney King]

We'll never know, because Shulman has stopped answering questions. Maybe he's working on his Charles Manson was framed by "the man" book.

[sissyjane]

Mr. Shulman is trying to sell his book, which is based on his theory, not on fact. I wonder what Jim Robinson would think of his self-serving advertisements?