He is an "anti-war activist" to the extent that other people have illegally copied his photos (violating copyright) and put them in their anti-war websites. Shame on WND.
If I'm not mistaken, he had to submit those photographs to "Images Against War". It's more about marketing though, than ideology...
The site has two pages with his name. How do you know the site is violating copyright as opposed to Sites's contributing to it.
If you have a source for that--I'll post it.