Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kevin Sites - imagesagainstwar.com (Fallujah shooting incident)
E-mail ^ | 11/17/04 | Unknown

Posted on 11/17/2004 8:05:47 AM PST by Luis Gonzalez

What happens when you send an anti-war activist to Iraq with our Marines? You get an ordinary wartime incident blown out of proportion and presented in such a way that a good soldier ends up accused of war crimes.

One of our fighting men has come "under investigation" for shooting a terrorist who was pretending to be dead in a mosque. of course, the media is spinning this as a "shooting of a wounded, unarmed Iraqi". Fact is that this was a terrorist playing dead, hoping one of our troops would get close enough to kill, or hoping to escape to kill other soldiers. Instead, this marine killed the enemy.

As we took Fallujah back from the terrorists, several of our Marines who approached the supposed dead or wounded terrorists were wounded or killed; this Marine was in a situation where he felt he was in danger and his fellow soldiers were in danger. This is war, and this Marine did his duty.

FACT: Kevin Sites is an anti-war activist. His pictures are on display as part of a "visual statement against the war" on Images Against War"...the name speaks for itself.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: bias; fallujah; fallujahmarine; goebbels; jihad; kevinsites; marine; mediabias; napalminthemorning; politicalcorrectness; rathergate; religionofpeace; shooter; sites; slanderngprivateryan; terrorists; trop; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last
To: GovernmentShrinker
"No, he was a dying man, not a "playing" anything "

Where you there?

61 posted on 11/17/2004 4:16:27 PM PST by Luis Gonzalez (Some people see the world as they would want it to be, effective people see the world as it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Rakkasan1

Did they have a choice or was Sites embedded with their squad by higher authority?? Maybe next time he'll stop a round.


62 posted on 11/17/2004 4:28:59 PM PST by kimosabe31
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez

No I wasn't, but the Marine commander that was there agreed that he was a wounded prisoner, and everyone who was there seems clear on the point that he was not booby-trapped. And if, as the Marine commander also agreed, he'd been there since being left by the previous group of coalition troops, who had held him prisoner and then left him for later pick-up, they must have been pretty sure he was thorougly disabled -- I don't think they'd leave behind wounded enemy who were still in any condition to pose a threat.


63 posted on 11/17/2004 4:39:55 PM PST by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentShrinker
"No I wasn't, but the Marine commander that was there agreed that he was a wounded prisoner, and everyone who was there seems clear on the point that he was not booby-trapped."

And we also know that Saddam did not have nukes...but we only know that because we invaded Iraq.

The man who did the shooting saw a terrorist move, and had a split second to make a decision.

War sucks, but we didn't start it.

64 posted on 11/17/2004 4:41:42 PM PST by Luis Gonzalez (Some people see the world as they would want it to be, effective people see the world as it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez

I agree with you whole-heartedly. How could the Marine possibly know what that terrorist might have been hiding under his robes? Especially given the circumstances (knowing that in other instances, terrorists has posed as wounded in order to lure soldiers forward only to kill them). He made the correct, split second decision.

Here is something I am borrowing from another website that I found extremely interesting and also very accurate. It's long, so bear with me:

How would the D-Day Invasion be Reported today?

This is what you would hear if Dan Rather, Peter Jennings, Tom Brokaw reported on D-Day at Normandy.

June 6, 1944. - NORMANDY- Three hundred French civilians were killed and thousands more wounded today in the first hours of America's invasion of continental Europe. Casualties were heaviest among women and children. Most of the French casualties were the result of artillery fire from American ships attempting to knock out German fortifications prior to the landing of hundreds of thousands of U.S. troops.

Reports from a makeshift hospital in the French town of St. Mere Eglise said the carnage was far worse than the French had anticipated and reaction against the American invasion was running high. "We are dying for no reason," said a Frenchman speaking on condition of anonymity. "Americans can't even shoot straight. I never thought I'd say this, but life was better under Adolph Hitler."

The invasion also caused severe environmental damage. American troops, tanks, trucks and machinery destroyed miles of pristine shoreline and thousands of acres of ecologically sensitive wetlands. It was believed that the habitat of the spineless French crab was completely wiped out, threatening the species with extinction. A representative of Greenpeace said his organization, which had tried to stall the invasion for over a year, was appalled at the destruction, but not surprised. "This is just another example of how the military destroys the environment without a second thought," said Christine Moanmore. "And it's all about corporate greed."

Contacted at his Manhattan condo, a member of the French government-in-exile who abandoned Paris when Hitler invaded said the invasion was based solely on American financial interests. "Everyone knows that President Roosevelt has ties to big beer," said Pierre LeWimp. "Once the German beer industry is conquered, Roosevelt's beer cronies will control the world market and make a fortune."

Administration supporters said America's aggressive actions were based in part on the assertions of controversial scientist Albert Einstein, who sent a letter to Roosevelt speculating that the Germans were developing a secret weapon, a so-called "atomic bomb."

Such a weapon could produce casualties on a scale never seen before and cause environmental damage that could last for thousands of years. Hitler has denied having such a weapon and international inspectors were unable to locate such weapons even after spending two long weekends in Germany.

Several thousand Americans died during the first hours of the invasion and French officials are concerned that uncollected corpses pose a public health risk.

"The Americans should have planned for this in advance," they said. "It's their mess and we don't intend to clean it up.


65 posted on 11/17/2004 4:49:18 PM PST by serpentineshel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentShrinker

In an active combat zone, your assumptions (he wasn't booby trapped, he must have been disabled) could and did (an in the case of Fallujah) get Marines killed. The "prisoners" were left unattended for a period of time. The Marine who shot him had no way to know, one, the insurgents degree of disability or capacity to attack, and two, whether he was armed or rigged with explosives (whether consciously or not). This really is a no- brainer, Monday morning quarterbacking aside. A Marine who has been engaged in mortal combat for a prolonged period went through a door in a combat zone, with no knowledge of what was on the other side and made a split second decision upon which his and his teammates lives depended. What do we say to him? Thank you for your service to your country. Semper Fidelis.


67 posted on 11/17/2004 4:59:34 PM PST by huac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

Comment #68 Removed by Moderator

To: huac
Plus who knew who may have crept back in to lay in wait among the bodies for the Marines making a follow up sweep. It has been clearly estabished that terrorists pre-positioned weapons to have at hand to kill Marines.

This Marine saw movement and reacted in a way that any soldier would have in the intense environment of Fallujah

69 posted on 11/17/2004 5:17:01 PM PST by Rooivalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Rooivalk
There are so many variables in this situation, so many decisions to make so quickly. Make one mistake, ONE, and you and your teammates are dead. That's hard. Being judged by people sitting (safely) in air-conditioned media booths? That's criminal.

"People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf." Orwell
70 posted on 11/17/2004 5:29:03 PM PST by huac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez

Looks like NCIS needs to ask Kevin some pointed questions about his creative video editing.


71 posted on 11/17/2004 6:05:55 PM PST by anymouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez

I fully support the Marine. I just don't think that requires vilifying the reporter, who has not publicly contradicted the Marine's version of events or of his reasonable beliefs at the time (and in fact has publicly said he can understand how the Marine could have reasonably believed that the man posed a threat, under the circumstances). Personally, I find that my understanding of the very difficult situation our troops are facing has been enhanced by this video and the information and discussion surrounding it. It's not clear that this wasn't the reporter's intention.


72 posted on 11/17/2004 6:09:05 PM PST by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez

Traitor NBC photographer email addresses:

kevinsites@hotmail.com

kevin@kevinsites.net

http://www.kevinsites.net/


73 posted on 11/17/2004 6:09:56 PM PST by jimbo123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: huac

See my post #72.


74 posted on 11/17/2004 6:10:07 PM PST by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: B-Cause

Kevin Sites: Ingrates don't last long as embeds.


75 posted on 11/17/2004 6:12:34 PM PST by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentShrinker

My comments were referring to your assumptions in post 63.


76 posted on 11/17/2004 6:17:03 PM PST by huac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentShrinker
Bump

I fully support the Marine. I just don't think that requires vilifying the reporter, who has not publicly contradicted the Marine's version of events or of his reasonable beliefs at the time (and in fact has publicly said he can understand how the Marine could have reasonably believed that the man posed a threat, under the circumstances). Personally, I find that my understanding of the very difficult situation our troops are facing has been enhanced by this video and the information and discussion surrounding it. It's not clear that this wasn't the reporter's intention.


Disagree with you on this one Shrinker. This reporter feeds on getting his work published and displayed on national TV. I find it hard to believe that he didn't know the impact of what he had just recorded. His actions impacted this young Marine significantly. The Marine had been shot in the face the day before, and the last thing he needs is some knee jerk reporter recording and reporting his efforts in combat. The Marines will have a way of taking care of this jerk reporter!

77 posted on 11/17/2004 6:25:11 PM PST by B-Cause (Old news media is going fast - Welcome to the NEW MEDIA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez

I hope this guy never works again. Boycott his work. Kick him off your staff. NBC, don't give him a dime. He's traitorous scum.


78 posted on 11/17/2004 7:22:33 PM PST by Ciexyz (Bush still rules. The sun shines over America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FarRightTexasDude
Bump

Does anybody know where Kevins Sites resides stateside?


Don't know Tex, but I ran across a few photos from his web site that were buried in his images directory (click here to go to his images directory). These photos look like individual photos of the Marine unit he was attached to (my assumption) and photos he had posted on November 6, 2004.


79 posted on 11/17/2004 7:36:46 PM PST by B-Cause (Old news media is going fast - Welcome to the NEW MEDIA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
They should at the very least be exposed.

This, yes, at the very least. I feel for this young man that they have not done "the least".

80 posted on 11/17/2004 7:44:28 PM PST by BunnySlippers (George W. Bush is our president ... Get over it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson