Your implication is that any group owns or controls an area rendered as public property, and therefore it is restricted to others. Right?
Can't be compared to gatherings held in private buildings.
Your implication is that any group owns or controls an area rendered as public property, and therefore it is restricted to others. Right? Can't be compared to gatherings held in private buildings. Yes, it can. The Boy Scouts hold gatherings on public property. But they can exclude gays from their membership. It cuts both ways - that also means that gays can exclude groups that they do not want at their gathering.