Then I have no idea what your point is. You've been throwing medical articles up to bolster your contention that reeve was in no condition to make the call. Wasn't that your point?
And I meant "whether" not "when" that's why I wrote "whether".
And to clarify my contention, I don't think it is being a tinfoiler to examine and discuss these articles, or even to go so far as trying to ascertain if Kerry is lying again.
Did I say it was? You claim that you base your opinions on what you read yet you can't correctly grasp what I've written. You completely misread my posts about tinfoil and still are.
You've based your opinions on things that a reporter says Kerry said without any quotation marks about what Kerry actually said and then fail to address the omission. Without quotes you don't know exactly what Kerry said. That's not speculation that's Journalism 101.
I haven't "thrown up" any medical articles. For someone who says I've failed journalism 101, you prove here that you haven't passed forum posting 101. Since you are such a stickler for details, such as insisting that the Kerry statement must have quotes, it's interesting you assigned medical articles to me without even checking. You're not doing too well with forum accuracy.
And let me get this straight. According to your instructions:
1. Don't believe Kerry said it because there are no quotes.
2. Don't believe Kerry received the call on Saturday, read more into it than it says
3. Don't even believe yet that Kerry got a call from Reeve, even though there are articles that say he did.
Now that sounds tinfoil to me. No thanks.