Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: xzins
But in fairness, on the Bush "style" front. President Bush should not have been looking agitated as Kerry spoke. Bush was fidgeting, looking bothered, even angry, as Kerry spoke.

Kerry might be criticized for taking notes as Bush spoke, and people will know he was just "acting" like he was making notes. But Bush's facial reactions will be used against him in democat ads. Bartlett said this morning that Bush knew ahead of time the cameras would be on him all the time, but (I hate to say this), Bush didn't look like he knew.

61 posted on 10/01/2004 6:43:36 AM PDT by YaYa123 (@ The People Will See Through The Spin...Not To Worry.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: YaYa123

I disagree.

I'm a counselor. I don't think his expression was angry. I thought it looked like a person in deep, intense thought.

Maybe agitation at their discussion of his being a liar..but that was an unfair question.

Other than that, all I saw as deep, intense, brow-furrowing reflection on his face.


65 posted on 10/01/2004 6:46:33 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army and Proudly Supporting BUSH/CHENEY 2004!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson