Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: TC Rider

No, he meant 90% of the coalition military casualties. What he means if we had a greater coalition with more troops from other countries, we would share more of the casualties. Which is true. Unfortunately France and Germany are wusses like him.


14 posted on 10/01/2004 6:20:50 AM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: plain talk

We should include the Iraqi National Guard as an ally. Their losses count, too.


23 posted on 10/01/2004 6:24:06 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army and Proudly Supporting BUSH/CHENEY 2004!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: plain talk

Their leaders will never send troops to Iraq for fear of what their own socialist media will do to them.


27 posted on 10/01/2004 6:26:15 AM PDT by Moderate right-winger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: plain talk
No, he meant 90% of the coalition military casualties. What he means if we had a greater coalition with more troops from other countries, we would share more of the casualties. Which is true. Unfortunately France and Germany are wusses like him.

"I believe America is safest and strongest when we are leading the world and we are leading strong alliances. I'll never give a veto to any country over our security. But I also know how to lead those alliances. This president has left them in shatters across the globe, and we're now 90 percent of the casualties in Iraq and 90 percent of the costs." Read it how you want.

37 posted on 10/01/2004 6:29:02 AM PDT by TC Rider (The United States Constitution © 1791. All Rights Reserved.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson