...According to Parlock, in a description of the scuffle that in the Washington, DC, Times yesterday, “They just pounced on us. She was crying; they were pushing and shoving her. She was scared.” (3)>>>>>>>
As the little girl’s photo circulated the internet, many members of Democratic Underground questioned the incident. After scouring the internet, they discovered that the photographer, Randy Snyder, who captured the image of the crying toddler, is chief photo editor of one newspaper that has frequently featured Phil Parlock’s conservative activism and interned with another newspaper that carried article about Parlock. Therefore, the photograph was not just a lucky shot by some AP photographer who happened to witness the ugly scene. Could Snyder and Parlock have planned the nasty shot? Could they have been working in collusion? Would a true journalist stoop so low? (4)
But there’s an additional twist—a twist that demonstrates just how twisted men like Parlock can be. One very perceptive DUer found a photograph of the Parlock clan on the internet—at the Herald-Dispatch website, which employs camerabug Snyder—and she noticed that one of the older sons bears a striking resemblance to the union worker who accosted Parlock’s shouldered daughter:
The Parlock clan:
A comparison of the “union worker” and the Parlock son:
And, to demonstrate the familial similarities, a comparison of the “union worker” and Phil Parlock:
Michelle Malin was right: these leftist maroons want to discover a hoax as powerful as our RATHGATE story so badly that they will grasp at ANY straw in this story, no matter how minimally gounded it is in fact.
Their CURRENT charges against the Parlocks are more or less summarized as follows:
"All them white boys in West Viginia look alike, so they MUST be related."How racist of them. :o)