To: AdrianSpidle
Look, Rather, Barnes and Burkett are all Texas homeboys ~ all are Democrats ~ no doubt they got together and conspired to do this.
The story has been under development for at least 4 years, and probably longer!
I wouldn't trust anybody finding excuses for Rather.
2 posted on
09/16/2004 6:35:09 AM PDT by
muawiyah
To: AdrianSpidle
C'mon now, how difficult was this? You should be ashamed of yourself.
Owl_Eagle
Guns Before Butter.
3 posted on
09/16/2004 6:36:51 AM PDT by
End Times Sentinel
(Coalesce, Capitulate, Collaborate. The French Strategy.)
To: AdrianSpidle
4 posted on
09/16/2004 6:37:11 AM PDT by
Michael Goldsberry
(Which part of "Don't Mess With Texas" didn't you get?)
To: AdrianSpidle
6 posted on
09/16/2004 6:42:10 AM PDT by
The G Man
(I'm mad as ZELL and I'm not gonna take it anymore!)
To: AdrianSpidle
"In Dan Rather's defense, it must be confessed, he is simply a newsreader. Now that Walter Cronkite is retired, Rather is TV's real-life Ted Baxter without Baxter's quiet dignity."
HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA
Ted Baxter
HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA
without Baxter's quiet dignity
HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA
Ann you are too damm funny! God Bless you (and when are you going to respons to my marriage proposals? dont be coy)
7 posted on
09/16/2004 6:42:46 AM PDT by
Mr. K
To: AdrianSpidle
The link below the title, AnnCoulter.org, does not take one to Ann's site, but to this Public Enquiry Project.
You sir, are dishonest & deceptive...traits not needed in the G.O.P.
9 posted on
09/16/2004 6:45:12 AM PDT by
jla
To: AdrianSpidle
innocent mistake and no one is accusing Dan Rather of some sort of "conspiracy,"He really, really wanted Gore to win in 2000, and his contract with CBS runs out in 2006. What's he got to lose? He thought he could pull it off.
Americans aren't stupid enough to believe there's no bias here. C'mon!
does Bill O'Reilly know what Dan Rather was thinking when he put forged documents on the air?
Why care what he thinks? The man is a centrist on everything. He has no core ideals.
What are the odds that Dan Rather would have accepted such patently phony documents from, say, the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth?
Why hasn't 60 minutes done a special on those fine men? No wonder CBS is on it's way out. It's become skank TV.
12 posted on
09/16/2004 6:47:42 AM PDT by
concerned about politics
( Liberals are still stuck at the bottom of Maslow's Hierarchy)
To: AdrianSpidle
Our gals are the best. We have Laura Ingraham, Ann coulter, Monica Crowley to name just a few.
Last night on the "O' Reilly Factor" Laura kicked the big O's ass. I just e-mailed O' Reilly and told him that laura ate his lunch last night and that he has lost most of his conservative audience and has himself to blame.
14 posted on
09/16/2004 6:56:26 AM PDT by
keysguy
(Trust the media as far as you can throw them)
To: AdrianSpidle
The truth is: Blather hates the Bush Family. Years ago, there was an incident wwhen Bllather was interviewing Bush
senior: Mr. Bush cleaned his clock!
To: AdrianSpidle
The Kitty Kelly stuff is priceless.
21 posted on
09/16/2004 7:15:17 AM PDT by
I'm ALL Right!
("When the going gets weird, anchor men punt." - Dan Rather, election 2000)
To: AdrianSpidle
HOW COME REPUBLICAN WOMEN LOOK BETTER, THINK BETTER AND WRITE BETTER THAN DEMOCRAT WOMEN?Simple: brains, beauty and ability.
Compare and contrast: Helen Thomas, MoDo, Eleanor Clift, Molly Ivins, Julienne Malveaux, Susan Estridge, Katie Couric etc.
There is probably more, but the self defense mechanisms in my brain prevent me from visualizing them!
26 posted on
09/16/2004 9:13:31 AM PDT by
SpinyNorman
(John Kerry: the choice of Islamofacists, communists and socialists the world over!!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson