This is first I've heard of the 2 new docs, and they really set off the BS alarm. One from June 1973 is to an unnamed superior and says that Killian and Harris dont' think they should rate Bush - what shoud they do? Oh my, the commander doesn't know how to read the regulation that governs the evaluation of officers not physically present.
In the other - from Februrary 1972 - Killian supposedly writes Harris to say "Keep me up to date on Bush's flight status". Why was this an issue in Feb 72?
To: bin2baghdad
2 posted on
09/11/2004 8:06:03 PM PDT by
bikepacker67
(Sandy wasn't stuffing his socks, he was stuffing A sock.)
To: bin2baghdad
Hmmmm.... So CBS had six docs not four.
Seems they didn't really buy the other two. Shouldn't that have made the entire crop suspect?
I think so.
To: bin2baghdad
Quick - one of our savy FR's need to "grab" and save the other two new documents before they disappear!
4 posted on
09/11/2004 8:08:58 PM PDT by
VRWCTexan
(History has a long memory - but still repeats itself)
To: bin2baghdad; Howlin; Southack; mabelkitty
HOLY SMOKES!!!
There were 6 DOCUMENTS, not 4...
One of the new "new documents" is a (cough) military memo that has no "To" header, just addressed, "Sir" and complains that Killian couldn't "rate" Bush.
It's even more ridiculous than the 4 that CBS did use....
8 posted on
09/11/2004 8:15:16 PM PDT by
Tamzee
(Free Republic .... Partisan Pajama People)
To: bin2baghdad
What's up with the slightly speckled outlines around each text block? Didn't see these on the CBS versions.
9 posted on
09/11/2004 8:15:18 PM PDT by
plangent
To: bin2baghdad
11 posted on
09/11/2004 8:25:09 PM PDT by
deport
(In politics, as in fishing, you don't have to be a genius. You just have to be smarter than the fish)
To: bin2baghdad
Regarding The "new" June 24 Memo - signature of Killian appears to be "forged" as compared to actual Killian signatures from GWB's ANG records ('i'm no expert - but they are very different)
14 posted on
09/11/2004 8:26:51 PM PDT by
VRWCTexan
(History has a long memory - but still repeats itself)
To: bin2baghdad
What?!? Two more docs? Probably still warm from the printer. Were they on CBS letterhead?
To: bin2baghdad
Hey, and this is important so listen up, you Republicans had better get used to the fact that when it comes to anti-Bush documents, the Kerry organization can produce 4 documents, 6 documents or as many documents as we can fabricate to prove whatever point we want to make. If we want to prove Bush was NEVER in Altanta, never, never, John and I can have 106 documents on Rather's desk by 10:00 AM tomorrow, We can forge any document to say whatever we want to prove!!!
19 posted on
09/11/2004 9:33:08 PM PDT by
Tacis
(Spiritual Help For Kerrorists - "WHAT WOULD BENEDICT ARNOLD DO?")
To: bin2baghdad; Mo1; nicmarlo; Budge
2 more documents fresh from the printer archives.
20 posted on
09/11/2004 10:10:24 PM PDT by
sweetliberty
("A wise man's heart inclines him to the right, but a fool's heart to the left." (Eccl. 10:2))
To: bin2baghdad
In the other - from Februrary 1972 - Notice it ONLY has his name at the bottom
22 posted on
09/11/2004 10:21:58 PM PDT by
Mo1
(Why is the MSM calling the Vietnam Vets and POW's a suspected group??)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson