Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A compendium of the Evidence (Rather forgery)
qando.net ^ | September 10, 2004 | Dale Franks

Posted on 09/10/2004 7:40:55 PM PDT by RogueIsland

A compendium of the Evidence Posted by Dale Franks

The blogosphere has been all over the CBS documents, but all the information is parceled out in penny packets all over the place. At the request of a reader, I thought I'd try to consolidate them into a single post. This is not canonical, of course, just the stuff I know about.

Typographical Arguments

1. The use of superscripted "th" in unit names, e.g. 187th. This was a highly unusual feature, available only on extremely expensive typewriters at the time.

2. The use of proportional fonts was, similarly, restricted to a small number of high-end typewriters.

3. The text of the memos appear to use letter kerning, a physical impossibility for any typewriter at the time. UPDATE: After manually recreating the 18 Aug 73 memo in both kerned and unkerned forms, I have concluded that the memo was not kerned. The font itself has a few internal kernings, which led to a mistaken impression that the document had been kerned.

4. Apostrophes in the documents use curled serifs. Typewriters used straight hash marks for both quotation marks and apostrophes.

5. The font appears indistinguishable from the Times New Roman computer font. While the Times Roman and Times fonts were rare, but available, in some typewriters at the time, the letters in Times Roman and Times took up more horizontal space than Times New Roman does. Times New Roman is exclusively a computer font.

6. Reproductions of the memos in Microsoft Word using 12pt TNR and the default Word page setup are indistinguishable from the memos when superimposed.

7. The typed squadron letterhead is centered on the page, an extremely difficult operation to perform manually.

8. Several highly reputable forensic document specialists have publicly stated their opinions that the documents were most likely computer generated, and hence, are forgeries.

9. The numeral 4 has no "foot" serif and a closed top. This is indicative of the Times New Roman Font, used exclusively by computers.

Stylistic Arguments

1. The memos do not use the proper USAF letterhead, in required use since 1948. Instead they are typed. In general, typed letterhead is restricted to computer-generated orders, which were usually printed by teletype, chain printer or daisy-wheel printer, the latter looking like a typed letter. Manually typed correspondence is supposed to use official USAF letterhead. However, even special orders, which used a typed letterhead, were required to use ALL CAPS in the letterhead.

2. The typed Letterhead gives the address as "Houston, Texas". The standard formulation for addresses at USAF installations should require the address to read "Ellington AFB, Texas".

3. Killian's signature block should read:

RICHARD B. KILLIAN, Lt Col, TexANG Commander

This is the required USAF formulation for a signature block.

4. Lt Col Killian's signature should be aligned to the left side of the page. Indented signature blocks are not a USAF standard.

5. The rank abbreviations are applied inconsistently and incorrectly, for example the use of periods in USAF rank abbreviations is incorrect. The modern formulation for rank abbreviations for the lieutenant grades in the USAF is 2Lt and 1Lt. In 1973, it may well have been 2nd Lt and 1st Lt, but that certainly wasn't correct in 1984, when I entered active duty, so I find the rank abbreviation questionable, and, in any event, they would not have included periods. Lt Col Killian's abbreviations are pretty much universally incorrect in the memos.

6. The unit name abbreviations use periods. This is incorrect. USAF unit abbreviations use only capital letters with no periods. For example, 111th Fighter Interceptor Squadron would be abbreviated as 111th FIS, not 111th F.I.S.

7. The Formulation used in the memos, i.e., "MEMORANDOM FOR 1st Lt. Bush..." is incorrect. A memo would be written on plain (non-letterhead) paper, with the top line reading "MEMORANDUM FOR RECORD".

8. An order from a superior, directing a junior to perform a specific task would not be in the memorandum format as presented. Instead, it would use the USAF standard internal memo format, as follows:

FROM: Lt Col Killian, Richard B.

SUBJECT: Annual Physical Examination (Flight)

TO: 1Lt Bush, George W.

Documents that are titled as MEMORANDUM are used only for file purposes, and not for communications.

9. The memos use the formulation "...in accordance with (IAW)..." The abbreviation IAW is a universal abbreviation in the USAF, hence it is not spelled out, rather it is used for no other reason than to eliminate the word "in accordance with" from official communications. There are several such universal abbreviation, such as NLT for "no later than".

10. The title of one of the memos is CYA, a popular euphemism for covering one's...ahem...posterior. It is doubtful that any serving officer would use such a colloquialism in any document that might come under official scrutiny.

Personal Arguments

1. The records purport to be from Lt Col Killian's "personal files", yet, they were not obtained from his family, but through some unknown 3rd party. It is an odd kind of "personal file" when the family of a deceased person is unaware of the file's existence and it is not in their possession.

2. Both Lt Col Killian's wife and son, as well as the EAFB personnel officer do not find the memos credible.

3. Keeping such derogatory personal memos , while at the same time, writing glowing OERs for Mr. Bush would be unwise for any officer. At best, it would raise serious questions about why his private judgments differed so radically from his official ones, should they ever come to light. At worst, they would raise questions about whether Lt Col Killian falsified official documents. As Lt Col Killian's son, himself a retired USAF officer, has said, nothing good can come of keeping such files.

4. Both Lt Col Killian's wife and son relate that Killian wasn't a typist. If he needed anotes, he would write them down longhand, but in general, he wasn't paper-oriented, and certainly wasn't a typist.

The reasons above constitute a very reasonable basis for serious questions about the legitimacy of the memos distributed by CBS. In light oif them, it seems to me that CBS has a positive duty to disclose as much information about the provenance and authenticity of the memos as possible. So far, their response has been, "We think they're true, so do not question us!" That is an understandable reaction, and, indeed, it's much the same as that of the German magazine Stern, when it claimed to have found Adolph Hitler's diaries in the 1980s.

It is not a helpful response, however, and it indicates that CBS is, at this point, far more interested in performing CYA operations than it is in getting to the bottom of these questions.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: 60minutes; compendium; rathergate; selectricgate
There are so many threads on so many aspects of this case that I thought this very concise summary of many of the germane issues would be a helpful reference card. I didn't find this particular compendium posted yet. Correct or embellish as you well.
1 posted on 09/10/2004 7:40:55 PM PDT by RogueIsland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RogueIsland
Thanks for posting this recap. This is a huge story.

BTTT

NFP

2 posted on 09/10/2004 7:46:32 PM PDT by Notforprophet (Democrats have stood their own arguments on their heads so often that they now stand for nothing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RogueIsland
Well authenticated documents from the same office over the same period do not match the CBS documents and obviously WERE typed with a typewriter.
3 posted on 09/10/2004 7:48:04 PM PDT by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RogueIsland

Well, I appreciate the effort. Now I understand the various arguments. If only Dan Rather would read it....


4 posted on 09/10/2004 7:50:35 PM PDT by theDentist ("John Kerry changes positions more often than a Nevada prostitute.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro

Keep 'em coming. I'll add another:

Col. Walter "Buck" Staudt was honorably discharged on March 1, 1972. CBS News reported this week that a memo in which Staudt was described as interfering with officers' negative evaluations of Bush's service, was dated Aug. 18, 1973.


5 posted on 09/10/2004 7:51:38 PM PDT by RogueIsland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: theDentist
Well, I appreciate the effort

I can't claim responsibility. The author is someone named Dale Franks at the link. Quite a thorough job.

6 posted on 09/10/2004 7:53:03 PM PDT by RogueIsland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RogueIsland

Then I appreciate your finding it, recognizing the value of it, and posting it.


7 posted on 09/10/2004 7:54:34 PM PDT by theDentist ("John Kerry changes positions more often than a Nevada prostitute.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: theDentist

Adding another:

Retired Maj. General Hodges, Killian's supervisor at the Grd, tells ABC News that he feels CBS misled him about the documents they uncovered. According to Hodges, CBS told him the documents were "handwritten" and after CBS read him excerpts he said, "well if he wrote them that's what he felt."


8 posted on 09/10/2004 7:55:19 PM PDT by RogueIsland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RogueIsland

Very good, thanks for the compilation.


9 posted on 09/10/2004 7:56:25 PM PDT by AmericanVictory (Should we be more like them, or they like us?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RogueIsland

Don't forget:

Vertical line spacing does not match a typewritten document.

And from a fellow Freeper whose name escapes me:

[A]nother aspect of the type on [the August 18, 1973 memo] suggests, perhaps proves, forgery. 1. The type in the document is KERNED. Kerning is the typsetter's art of spacing various letters in such a manner that they are 'grouped' for better readability. Word processors do this automatically. NO TYPEWRITER CAN PHYSICALLY DO THIS.

To explain: the letter 'O' is curved on the outside. A letter such as 'T' has indented space under its cross bar. On a typewriter if one types an 'O' next to a 'T' then both letters remain separated by their physical space. When you type the same letters on a computer next to each other the are automatically 'kerned' or 'grouped' so that their individual spaces actually overlap. e. g., TO. As one can readily see the curvature of the 'O' nestles neatly under the cross bar of the 'T'. Two good kerning examples in the alleged memo are the word 'my' in the second line where 'm' and 'y' are neatly kerned and also the word 'not' in the fourth line where the 'o' and 't' overlap empty space. A typewriter doesn't 'know' what particular letter is next to another and can't make those types of aesthetic adjustments.

2. The kerning and proportional spacing in each of the lines of type track EXACTLY with 12 point Times Roman font on a six inch margin (left justified). Inother words, the sentences break just as they would on a computer and not as they would on a typewriter. Since the type on the memo is both proportionally spaced and kerned the lines of type break at certain instances (i.e., the last word in each line of the first paragraph are - 1. running, 2. regarding, 3. rating, 4. is, 5. either). If the memo was created on a typewriter the line breaks would be at different words (e. g., the word 'running' is at the absolute outside edge of the sentence and would probably not be on the first line).

3. The sentences have a wide variance in their AMOUNT of kerning and proportional spacing. Notice how the first line of the first paragraph seems squished together and little hard to read but the last line of the first paragraph has wider more open spacing. Even the characters themselves are squished in the first line (as a computer does automatically) and more spread out on the last line where there is more room.

There's no way a typewriter could 'set' the type in this memo and even a good typesetter using a Linotype machine of the era would have to spend hours getting this effect.


10 posted on 09/10/2004 7:58:51 PM PDT by need_a_screen_name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RogueIsland
3. The text of the memos appear to use letter kerning, a physical impossibility for any typewriter at the time. UPDATE: After manually recreating the 18 Aug 73 memo in both kerned and unkerned forms, I have concluded that the memo was not kerned. The font itself has a few internal kernings, which led to a mistaken impression that the document had been kerned.

Microsoft Word has auto-kerning as default. You can customize the kerning settings, but not doing so does not mean it is not kerned.
11 posted on 09/10/2004 7:59:21 PM PDT by counterpunch (The CouNTeRPuNcH Collection - www.counterpunch.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RogueIsland

CBS: Not Sinking!

Capt. Rather On Bridge!

'Rats Deserting Ship!

12 posted on 09/10/2004 7:59:28 PM PDT by Travis McGee (----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RogueIsland
I believe the standard font is Courier 12 for official DOD correspondence, not Time Roman.
13 posted on 09/10/2004 8:03:07 PM PDT by SolitaryMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RogueIsland; Notforprophet

RogueIsland: Thank you so much for this.

I've read so much about this in the last 36 hours, keeping it all on track is difficult.

I'm going to temporarily bookmark this. I'm sure new evidence will emerge.

NFP: How the hell are ye babe? Hope married life is treating you, and your eminently better half wonderfully! Miss you guys! ;-)


14 posted on 09/10/2004 8:04:39 PM PDT by Happygal (liberalism - a narrow tribal outlook largely founded on class prejudice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RogueIsland
3. The text of the memos appear to use letter kerning, a physical impossibility for any typewriter at the time. UPDATE: After manually recreating the 18 Aug 73 memo in both kerned and unkerned forms, I have concluded that the memo was not kerned. The font itself has a few internal kernings, which led to a mistaken impression that the document had been kerned

Regarding kerning, here is what I found:

The top part was from the August 1 memo, and the bottom from the August 18 memo. The August 18 memo appears to be kerned, but the Microsoft Word overlay that matches almost exactly did not have kerning specified, so perhaps it is just artifacts from all the copying

15 posted on 09/10/2004 9:31:50 PM PDT by rocklobster11
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rocklobster11

the image has been modified to show that the "f" in all forged documents overhangs the next character. In the proportional typewriter fonts shown at the bottom, there is no overlap. So, the question is whether any typewriter font had an f that allowed characters to overhang


16 posted on 09/10/2004 11:24:53 PM PDT by rocklobster11
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson