To: crushelits
2 posted on
09/10/2004 8:15:42 AM PDT by
The G Man
(I'm mad as ZELL and I'm not gonna take it anymore!)
To: crushelits
![](http://pages.sbcglobal.net/atomicpossum/segami/apossum2.gif)
The author sounds as mad as Zell.
3 posted on
09/10/2004 8:16:41 AM PDT by
atomicpossum
(If there are two Americas, John Edwards isn't qualified to lead either of them.©)
To: crushelits
Pat Cadell seems to be another one who is fretting over what the DNC hath wrought. Just saw him on Fox talking about just how bad Kerry's internals are and how bad the vietnam discussion is for his candidacy.
4 posted on
09/10/2004 8:17:49 AM PDT by
Cosmo
(There are no memoes of mass destruction, no stockpiles, no reconstituted nuclear memo programs)
To: crushelits
>>Well, yes, there is. The Democratic Party could have nominated Joe Lieberman.
Yes, or Zell Miller. The general consensus is that they wanted someone who could beat Bush. We'll see how they feel when Kerry gives his concession speech on Nov. 2.
"Happy days are here again, they are crying in their
beer again; it is wait until next year again..." :)
To: crushelits
But does this mean she's voting for Bush?
6 posted on
09/10/2004 8:18:51 AM PDT by
sarasota
To: crushelits
My dem husband--who does not like Pres. Bush--is probably going to vote for him [the president]. Had Lieberman been nominated, he would be quite happily voting for him [Lieberman] instead. Yes, the dems made a huge mistake with Kerry.
12 posted on
09/10/2004 8:23:47 AM PDT by
twigs
To: crushelits
What were the Democratic Party leaders thinking?
Don't forget .. if Dean hadn't done that Scream .. Kerry might not have gotten the votes in the primary
14 posted on
09/10/2004 8:24:41 AM PDT by
Mo1
(FR NEWS ALERT .... John Kerry over dosed on Botox and thinks he's Bob KerrEy)
To: crushelits
In the Democrat party it's not anymore who is or could be the best candidate for President but who can bring in or give the most money to the Democrat Party. That has been going on since Kennedy.
15 posted on
09/10/2004 8:25:03 AM PDT by
AIC
To: crushelits
Sounds like another Zell's Angel.
17 posted on
09/10/2004 8:25:33 AM PDT by
hoosiermama
(Bush Democrats = Zell's Angels)
To: crushelits
I agree that out of the 7/8 democrat candidates, Joe Liberman's character was head and sholders above the others. And it was his character that doomed his campaign. The base hates him.
18 posted on
09/10/2004 8:30:14 AM PDT by
DaveMSmith
(CEO, VRWC: When you think treason, don't think Benedict Arnold - think JOHN FORGE KERRY!)
To: crushelits
"The Democratic Party could have nominated Joe Lieberman."
The hilarious part is that John O'Neill (Unfit for Command) AND many of the swiftboat vets probably WOULD have voted for Lieberman! O'Neill has already said he voted for Gore, and would have voted for Edwards! If the whole idea behind nominating Kerry WAS the Clintons'/McAuliffe's idea (in anticipation of Hillary in 2008), they sure did know what they were doing, IMO!
19 posted on
09/10/2004 8:30:25 AM PDT by
Maria S
("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." Hillary Clinton, 6/28/04)
To: crushelits
Place this Kerry nomination at the feet of Mc Auliffe.
He who presided over "one Bush at at time" in Florida with Jebb Bush and got beat, came to realize that accepted campaign strategies won't do. Mc Auliffe then started a two year hate Bush campaign and on top of it split up the country, (see Edward's announcement) In the Iowa primaries the way front favorite and true Democrat Howard Dean announced his intention to fire
Mc Auliffe.
And look what followed, the media darling Dean suddenly turned media outcast, Kerry, way behind came up with a $6.5 million Teresa backed loan to smear and dismantle Howard Dean.
The rest is history and is set to play out come Nov.2, 2004.
Mc Auliffe's record: Losing the Senate, Jebb Bush, Gore, and coming up: Kerry.
22 posted on
09/10/2004 8:38:50 AM PDT by
hermgem
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson