Skip to comments.
Plan for nuclear space ships
icChershireOnline ^
| 08/09/04
Posted on 08/09/2004 6:10:33 PM PDT by KevinDavis
NASA is spending £4m on developing futuristic electric propulsion systems that may one day carry people to Mars.
The three-year programme, part of the American space agency's Prometheus project, will involve designing new kinds of nuclear power plant for spacecraft.
(Excerpt) Read more at iccheshireonline.icnetwork.co.uk ...
TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: mars; nulcear; warp
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
Yet Kerry says we are not doing enough in science..
To: RightWhale; Brett66; xrp; gdc314; sionnsar; anymouse; RadioAstronomer; NonZeroSum; jimkress; ...
2
posted on
08/09/2004 6:11:35 PM PDT
by
KevinDavis
(Let the meek inherit the Earth, the rest of us will explore the stars!)
To: KevinDavis
The idea of nuclear rockets has quite a bit of merit. Many of the original creators of the atom bomb went on to participate in "Project Orion", an Air Force endeavor to harness nuclear energy for propulsion. "Orion" ran into snags due to nonproliferation treaties and eventually got scrapped in the late 1960's, but progress has slowly been made on rockets that use nuclear reactions both directly and indirectly for acceleration. Very cool stuff.
3
posted on
08/09/2004 6:15:07 PM PDT
by
Omedalus
To: KevinDavis
Cool, the USS Prometheus!
4
posted on
08/09/2004 6:15:39 PM PDT
by
xrp
To: KevinDavis
NASA is spending £4m on developing futuristic electric propulsion systems that may one day carry people to Mars. Cool that they are using pounds.
5
posted on
08/09/2004 6:16:17 PM PDT
by
Sam Cree
(Democrats are herd animals)
To: KevinDavis
I much prefer Orion, if only emotionally, to nuclear powered ION engines.
There's something intrinsically satisfying about shoving a nuke under a Big metal plate.
I guarantee, that sucker will GO!
6
posted on
08/09/2004 6:17:10 PM PDT
by
Phsstpok
(often wrong, but never in doubt)
To: KevinDavis
How did I get off it in the first place?
7
posted on
08/09/2004 6:18:13 PM PDT
by
Camel Joe
(Proud Uncle of a Fine Young Marine)
To: KevinDavis
The space ping I mean... of course.
8
posted on
08/09/2004 6:20:10 PM PDT
by
Camel Joe
(Proud Uncle of a Fine Young Marine)
To: xrp
Ugly, inefficient, and crude. Here's a REAL beauty:
9
posted on
08/09/2004 6:23:39 PM PDT
by
asgardshill
(Jury Duty REJECT - Perfect 0 and 11 record stands.)
To: Phsstpok
I much prefer Orion Hear, hear! I don't see any other way to get humongous, heavily shielded ships into space at a bargain basement price. And you need both size and heavy shielding if you want your crews to be both safe and relatively comfortable.
To: KevinDavis
One idea is for a nuclear-powered engine that magnetically accelerates plasma-gas with molecules which are electrically charged. Isn't that what used to be called "Ion Drive"?
11
posted on
08/09/2004 6:24:48 PM PDT
by
BenLurkin
("A republic, if we can revive it")
To: asgardshill
Sorry, that doesn't have the multi-vector assault mode (seen in my picture). Starfleet would own your egg-carton imitation ship there.
12
posted on
08/09/2004 6:27:25 PM PDT
by
xrp
To: Omedalus
Very cool stuff.
13
posted on
08/09/2004 6:29:17 PM PDT
by
Oztrich Boy
("Despise not the jester. Often he is the only one speaking the truth")
To: LibWhacker
Well, you could have the propulsion system a mile or so ahead of you (or behind you). That would make the radiation tolerable.
To: Kettlebelly_0
I was just thinking about the naturally high-radiation environment of space (cosmic rays, etc.), never mind radiation from your own propulsion system.
To: xrp
Starfleet would own your egg-carton imitation ship there. A Starfleet vessel would find it remarkably difficult to own any ship that could simply reach in and "disappear" the matter-antimatter containment apparatus. (Not to mention the front of the aquarium in the Captain's Ready Room.)
Geek fight!!!
16
posted on
08/09/2004 6:34:41 PM PDT
by
asgardshill
(Jury Duty REJECT - Perfect 0 and 11 record stands.)
To: Oztrich Boy
A ground based Orion launch, now that would be something- especially if it was right next to Greenpeace HQ.
17
posted on
08/09/2004 6:41:08 PM PDT
by
Brett66
(http://www.scifiartposters.com)
To: BenLurkin
Isn't that what used to be called "Ion Drive"? Ion or plasma motors. The power supply could be solar. Of course, if the ion propulsion is stronger than butterfly wings, nuclear would do well. Interstellar would have to be nuclear.
18
posted on
08/09/2004 6:58:08 PM PDT
by
RightWhale
(Withdraw from the 1967 UN Outer Space Treaty and establish property rights)
To: KevinDavis
Here's an interesting story out of Japan today on new technologies for space flight:
ISAS Deployed Solar Sail Film in Space. I noticed some comments about ion propulsion; Japan has the Hayabusa mission which is currently using Japan's microwave ion propulsion system on its way to recover samples from the asteroid Itokawa in the asteroid belt. If it manages to carry this mission off, it is supposed to be back to Earth with samples in 2007 -- a pretty quick trip considering how long it has taken to go to Mars or the lastest mission to Mercury's schedule.
To: Omedalus
The idea of nuclear rockets has quite a bit of merit. Many of the original creators of the atom bomb went on to participate in "Project Orion", an Air Force endeavor to harness nuclear energy for propulsion. "Orion" ran into snags due to nonproliferation treaties and eventually got scrapped in the late 1960's, but progress has slowly been made on rockets that use nuclear reactions both directly and indirectly for acceleration. Very cool stuff.NERVA was way cool (and it worked too)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson