Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Plan for nuclear space ships
icChershireOnline ^ | 08/09/04

Posted on 08/09/2004 6:10:33 PM PDT by KevinDavis

NASA is spending £4m on developing futuristic electric propulsion systems that may one day carry people to Mars.

The three-year programme, part of the American space agency's Prometheus project, will involve designing new kinds of nuclear power plant for spacecraft.

(Excerpt) Read more at iccheshireonline.icnetwork.co.uk ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: mars; nulcear; warp
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
Yet Kerry says we are not doing enough in science..
1 posted on 08/09/2004 6:10:35 PM PDT by KevinDavis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RightWhale; Brett66; xrp; gdc314; sionnsar; anymouse; RadioAstronomer; NonZeroSum; jimkress; ...

2 posted on 08/09/2004 6:11:35 PM PDT by KevinDavis (Let the meek inherit the Earth, the rest of us will explore the stars!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

The idea of nuclear rockets has quite a bit of merit. Many of the original creators of the atom bomb went on to participate in "Project Orion", an Air Force endeavor to harness nuclear energy for propulsion. "Orion" ran into snags due to nonproliferation treaties and eventually got scrapped in the late 1960's, but progress has slowly been made on rockets that use nuclear reactions both directly and indirectly for acceleration. Very cool stuff.


3 posted on 08/09/2004 6:15:07 PM PDT by Omedalus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis
Cool, the USS Prometheus!


4 posted on 08/09/2004 6:15:39 PM PDT by xrp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis
NASA is spending £4m on developing futuristic electric propulsion systems that may one day carry people to Mars.

Cool that they are using pounds.

5 posted on 08/09/2004 6:16:17 PM PDT by Sam Cree (Democrats are herd animals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis
I much prefer Orion, if only emotionally, to nuclear powered ION engines.

There's something intrinsically satisfying about shoving a nuke under a Big metal plate.

I guarantee, that sucker will GO!

6 posted on 08/09/2004 6:17:10 PM PDT by Phsstpok (often wrong, but never in doubt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

How did I get off it in the first place?


7 posted on 08/09/2004 6:18:13 PM PDT by Camel Joe (Proud Uncle of a Fine Young Marine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

The space ping I mean... of course.


8 posted on 08/09/2004 6:20:10 PM PDT by Camel Joe (Proud Uncle of a Fine Young Marine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: xrp
Ugly, inefficient, and crude. Here's a REAL beauty:


9 posted on 08/09/2004 6:23:39 PM PDT by asgardshill (Jury Duty REJECT - Perfect 0 and 11 record stands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Phsstpok
I much prefer Orion

Hear, hear! I don't see any other way to get humongous, heavily shielded ships into space at a bargain basement price. And you need both size and heavy shielding if you want your crews to be both safe and relatively comfortable.

10 posted on 08/09/2004 6:23:44 PM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis
One idea is for a nuclear-powered engine that magnetically accelerates plasma-gas with molecules which are electrically charged.

Isn't that what used to be called "Ion Drive"?

11 posted on 08/09/2004 6:24:48 PM PDT by BenLurkin ("A republic, if we can revive it")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: asgardshill

Sorry, that doesn't have the multi-vector assault mode (seen in my picture). Starfleet would own your egg-carton imitation ship there.


12 posted on 08/09/2004 6:27:25 PM PDT by xrp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Omedalus
Very cool stuff.


13 posted on 08/09/2004 6:29:17 PM PDT by Oztrich Boy ("Despise not the jester. Often he is the only one speaking the truth")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Well, you could have the propulsion system a mile or so ahead of you (or behind you). That would make the radiation tolerable.


14 posted on 08/09/2004 6:30:11 PM PDT by Kettlebelly_0
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Kettlebelly_0

I was just thinking about the naturally high-radiation environment of space (cosmic rays, etc.), never mind radiation from your own propulsion system.


15 posted on 08/09/2004 6:34:06 PM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: xrp
Starfleet would own your egg-carton imitation ship there.

A Starfleet vessel would find it remarkably difficult to own any ship that could simply reach in and "disappear" the matter-antimatter containment apparatus. (Not to mention the front of the aquarium in the Captain's Ready Room.)

Geek fight!!!

16 posted on 08/09/2004 6:34:41 PM PDT by asgardshill (Jury Duty REJECT - Perfect 0 and 11 record stands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Oztrich Boy
A ground based Orion launch, now that would be something- especially if it was right next to Greenpeace HQ.
17 posted on 08/09/2004 6:41:08 PM PDT by Brett66 (http://www.scifiartposters.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Isn't that what used to be called "Ion Drive"?

Ion or plasma motors. The power supply could be solar. Of course, if the ion propulsion is stronger than butterfly wings, nuclear would do well. Interstellar would have to be nuclear.

18 posted on 08/09/2004 6:58:08 PM PDT by RightWhale (Withdraw from the 1967 UN Outer Space Treaty and establish property rights)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis
Here's an interesting story out of Japan today on new technologies for space flight: ISAS Deployed Solar Sail Film in Space.

I noticed some comments about ion propulsion; Japan has the Hayabusa mission which is currently using Japan's microwave ion propulsion system on its way to recover samples from the asteroid Itokawa in the asteroid belt. If it manages to carry this mission off, it is supposed to be back to Earth with samples in 2007 -- a pretty quick trip considering how long it has taken to go to Mars or the lastest mission to Mercury's schedule.

19 posted on 08/09/2004 7:34:56 PM PDT by snowsislander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Omedalus
The idea of nuclear rockets has quite a bit of merit. Many of the original creators of the atom bomb went on to participate in "Project Orion", an Air Force endeavor to harness nuclear energy for propulsion. "Orion" ran into snags due to nonproliferation treaties and eventually got scrapped in the late 1960's, but progress has slowly been made on rockets that use nuclear reactions both directly and indirectly for acceleration. Very cool stuff.

NERVA was way cool (and it worked too)

20 posted on 08/09/2004 8:17:02 PM PDT by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson