My question: She's disgusted by the aborted child's body, but she's not disgusted at the procedure that makes the child look that way. I'll agree that they should not be flying that banner as kids get out of school, but shouldn't these people be proud of that? I mean, it's what happens when they exercise their so treasured "right"....
To: CSM; starboardlist; redlipstick; 11th Earl of Mar; smadurski
Ping! Please FReepmail me if you want on/off this ping list.
2 posted on
05/04/2004 6:20:32 AM PDT by
WinOne4TheGipper
(DUers are God's warning to the rest of us.)
To: WinOne4TheGipper
From the "What is bad for America is good for the Dems" file:
As bad as it is to see people still losing their jobs, this is what is going to potentially put these idiots out of office. People will swallow just about anything these days, but when it hits them in the pocketbooks they start to wake up. Of course these people are assholes too.
Posted by: kysrsoze
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x5292844 posted on
05/04/2004 9:40:22 AM PDT by
CSM
(Vote Kerry! Boil the Frog! Speed up the 2nd Revolution! (Be like Spain! At least they're honest))
To: WinOne4TheGipper
She's disgusted by the aborted child's body, but she's not disgusted at the procedure that makes the child look that way. Liberals are weird like that. I was watching Hannity & Praying Mantis tonight and Mantis got his panties all in a wad when his guest, John O'Neill, suggested that DemocRAT Presidential Candidate (for now) John Effing Kerry may not have deserved one or more of his Purple Hearts but not once has Mantis ever expressed outrage at Kerry for suggesting that hundreds of his fellow Vietnam veterans were war criminals.
My way of putting it is thus: If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all.
To: WinOne4TheGipper
I was banned after writing five words (in response to the abortion topic):
The truth hurts, doesn't it?
They can't tolerate any semblance of truth that penetrates their protected and ideological little lives. They only hear what they want to hear, they don't want to know of the reality of abortion and what it actually is. How could a party possibly advocate being the "party of compassion" or "party of the people" when they are so vehemently cold and hardened towards the smallest of human beings, the unborn? I felt no sense of peaceful, human compassion on the thread (or any thread for that matter), no love of humanity, even from those who like to think they are Buddhists or model themselves after Gandhi. They would sooner protect a dandelion than a fetus.
Returning to FR is like snuggling up by a warm fireplace after coming in from the freezing cold. :)
10 posted on
05/05/2004 8:44:05 AM PDT by
zenblends
(I never make stupid mistakes. Only very, very clever ones.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson