Skip to comments.
Republicans Against George Bush
Personal Creation
| 1/21/04
| Manny Paulet
Posted on 01/21/2004 9:58:05 AM PST by MannyP
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 221-234 next last
To: MannyP
Personal Creation | You just made me pro-choice.
To: levotb
have read the previous chats on this thread "berating" those of us who are pushing for a Third Party. You confuse berating with plain old ridicule. Go create the 500th version of a 3rd party. Hell in a century or so you may get above 1 percent. The flea running up the elephants leg with rape on its mind can't hold a candle to the we are going to teach them a lesson this time" midgets.
To: RunningJoke
I'm considering to vote a Democrat(leftist) in as President. I'll bet you floss with an electrical drill too.
To: levotb
But, unlike you and the RINOs, I don't want 4 more years of Bush. Don't come out in public please.
To: Texasforever; JohnHuang2
The flea running up the elephant's leg with rape on its mind can't hold a candle to the we are going to teach them a lesson this time" midgets.LMAO! My nomination for quote of the day. LOL!
65
posted on
01/23/2004 1:08:39 AM PST
by
onyx
(Your secrets are safe with me and all my friends.)
To: My2Cents
Is this the "McCain in '08" site? No even the Mcaniacs weren't this stupid. This is the "we will never vote for Bush again just like we didn't vote for him before" site.
To: onyx; Texasforever; RJayneJ
Jayne, see #62 ;-)
To: Nanodik; Texasforever; My2Cents; BigSkyFreeper; MEG33; Tamsey
Look here everyone, Nanodik is ranting about amnesty but he's a self-described "Libertarian," the party that calls for OPEN BORDERS!
LMAO!
Nanodik (Libertarian, Ex-Canadian)
68
posted on
01/23/2004 1:14:14 AM PST
by
onyx
(Your secrets are safe with me and all my friends.)
To: onyx
Pathetic.
69
posted on
01/23/2004 1:19:42 AM PST
by
MEG33
To: MEG33
LOL. Yeah, pathetic. LOL!
70
posted on
01/23/2004 1:22:04 AM PST
by
onyx
(Your secrets are safe with me and all my friends.)
To: levotb
But, unlike you and the RINOs, I don't want 4 more years of Bush. I was fooled into voting for him the last time 'round because I didn't want to see Gore in The White House. John Kerry does not scare me like Gore did
If you're for real,Kerry should frighten you even more than AlGore. You can do the research then tell us all how John Forbes Kerry is a good deal for the country and for you.We're waiting in breathless anticipation for your wish and well reasoned answer.
71
posted on
01/23/2004 1:30:56 AM PST
by
gatorbait
(Yesterday, today and tomorrow......The United States Army)
To: Texasforever
The flea running up the elephants leg with rape on its mind
I'm rolling here... I can't get the visuals out of my head ;-)
72
posted on
01/23/2004 1:37:48 AM PST
by
Tamzee
(W '04..... America may not survive a Democrat at this point in our history....)
To: levotb
Kerry is a flaming Liberal.I have never been so convinced that any democrat in the Presidency at this time is a DANGER to this nation.
73
posted on
01/23/2004 1:54:43 AM PST
by
MEG33
To: Texasforever
"I'll bet you floss with an electrical drill too."
No, I don't. But I refuse to vote for liberal Bush just because he claims he's a conservative. Perhaps, you should drill a hole in your head, because evidently you cannot see the liberal George W. Bush's actions. Do you need them listed out or are you just a troll that belongs to the Republican Party because it is the "in" thing?
You and the other two posters remind me of this quote: "It is as though our inner self is always in a state of war. No totalitarian censor can approach the implacability of the censor who controls the line of communication between the outer world and our consciousness. Nothing is allowed to reach us which might weaken our confidence and lower our morale. To most of us nothing is so invisible as an unpleasant truth. Though it is held before our eyes, pushed under our noses, rammed down our throats--we know it not."
To: RunningJoke
Great name.Fitting,too.
75
posted on
01/23/2004 5:29:46 AM PST
by
MEG33
To: MEG33
MEG33,
Thankee. I see that the liberals do not have a monopoly on "Ad Hominem" attacks.
Have a nice day.
To: onyx
Look here everyone, Nanodik is ranting about amnesty but he's a self-described "Libertarian," the party that calls for OPEN BORDERS! Unlike the Bushbots around here, just because an idea comes from my party does not necessarily mean I will support it.
77
posted on
01/23/2004 6:57:47 AM PST
by
Nanodik
(Libertarian, Ex-Canadian)
To: RunningJoke
Your screen name says a lot about you.
To: gatorbait
...tell us all how John Forbes Kerry is a good deal for the country and for you.Correction: that name should be John FRAUD Kerry.
To: My2Cents
...other than to confirm to the Bush supporters the absolutely necessity of getting him re-elected.Truer words were never written. After listening to the remaining Democrats last night, I am convinced that re-electing Bush means life, or death, for our nation. This is the most crucial election my country has faced in my rather lengthy lifetime.
Look at the choices:
1) A maniac (or at least bi-polar) doctor with delusions of grandeur.2) An admitted perjurer reverend who bases his claim to fame and leadership on a made up case full of lies.
3) A fraud from New England -- lied about his ethnicity and then changed it when it became more convenient to claim something else. Flip-flopped from a VN War supporter (1st campaign) to an Anti-War demonstrator (after he lost the 1st campaign) and who threw someone else's medals away and lied about it to grab the headlines. Flip-flopped on his support of the Iraq War -- voted to get in, then withheld his vote to support the troops with funds. I sure don't want to place my life and the lives of my children and grandchildren in Kerry's hands.
4) A "still wet behind the ears" Southern lawyer who made his fortune on the backs of the disabled and who blathers on, bluffing about subjects he knows nothing about -- Islam, foreign policy, education. Is this the candidate who wants to turn the oil and all the contracts over to the UN to manage? Or is that #5? In any case, don't these creeps remember all the UN food found in the bombed out kitchen of Uday Hussein? Could we really trust the UN to handle the oil and the reconstruction contracts without being stolen blind by them?
5) A former general who was relieved of his command for reasons we still do not know, but his former colleagues are not supporting him. He knows nothing about domestic policy and has "secret" plans for ending the war in Iraq by turning over the whole operation to the UN (an organization that didn't want it in the first place.) He's also a major flip-flopper.
6) A US Rep who is just plain weird. Three wives got rid of him. Why would we want him?
7) A Senator and former VP candidate who is the most reasonable of the bunch but who seems weak and ineffective as a leader.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 221-234 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson