[strela]

It's equally logical to think he has banned posters in mind who should not have been banned when others have not been banned.

But that's not what Saber said. His exact words were:

"It's not just who you ban, it's who you don't ban. The inconsistencies are found between the two."

I am incapable of reading minds, and believe that Saber is capable of clarifying his request if he wants to do so. Further, if Saber has candidates in mind who HAVE been banned that he thinks should be unbanned, he is equally free to propose them as well. I just think that Saber should name names if he is going to call for banning of posters first.

Why not think positively, rather than negatively? Why not unban those banned posters? Or would you rather have more purging?

I made my feelings on banning clear in Post 841. The ball's in Saber's court now, and I would respectfully suggest that you take the matter up with him if you're not satisfied with the way he phrased his question.

[aristeides]

Sabertooth complained about an inconsistency. There are two ways to resolve that inconsistency, and I believe the more generous way is far preferable. I would be very surprised if Sabertooth did not agree.