[Jim Robinson]

Look, I'm not going to get into a who started it tit for tat debate. If his attacks continue, he will get sacked. If others are also attacking they will probably get reported also and we'll deal with them on a case by case basis. People who can't be civil will probably get away with it for awhile, but if they keep it up after being warned and suspended they will eventually be banned. And it doesn't matter what their political or religious leanings are.

[AndrewC]

If others are also attacking they will probably get reported also and we'll deal with them on a case by case basis.

That apparently assumes an equal likelihood of complaint. It is the Christian viewpoint to accept some derision.

[bondserv]

It's the difference between Rush Limbaugh and Bill Clinton.

One has a moral set of standards and is called a hypocrite. The other lives by no standards and his ill behavior is expected. Accountability is the key to our countries blessings.

Rush has character and is willing and able to repent.
Clinton can't and won't repent of the behavior he wishes to protect. (Master of the troll clause).

Is it all relative? Who do we wish to associate with?

P.S. I do love your forum, and I pray it continues to be a pillar of both social and fiscal conservative views.

Thank you for your hard work.

bondserv