[VadeRetro]

A-G had been brought into it explicitly in Ditto's 927 and by no-name reference in her 905. I was brought in the same way. A revisionist sob story is offered. You are mentioned unfavorably. You can ignore it or answer it. Maybe it would be better to ignore it, but the topic is open.

A-G's 1145 names no one not already named in the discussion or talked about within the body of her own post as part of the narrative (necessary in setting facts straight) and thus ping-able except OWK and Piltdown_Woman. Are these two, the only "gratuitously-pinged" freepers on post 1145, responsible for the hijacking of this thread?

[Aracelis]

A-G's 1145 names no one not already named in the discussion or talked about within the body of her own post as part of the narrative (necessary in setting facts straight) and thus ping-able except OWK and Piltdown_Woman. Are these two, the only "gratuitously-pinged" freepers on post 1145, responsible for the hijacking of this thread?

LOL! I've "hijacked" a few things (only people) in my life, but never a thread. I read the accusation, but decided to shrug it off. Arguing with someone who may not be entirely stable is an excercise in futility, and besides, I do have a fulfilling life apart from FR.

[Alamo-Girl]

Thank you so much for your support! I pinged Piltdown_Woman and OWK because they had witnessed much of what I discussed and would be able to make any necessary clarifications.