[jennyp]

Remember the moon dust problem? Scientists with their evolutionary presuppositions feared the dust would be so deep it could swallow up any craft that attempted to land. After a trip they found that their presuppositions and calculations needed to be "adjusted" since they found nearly no dust.

No, after satellites started collecting space dust directly, they adjusted their "presuppositions" down to 1/50th the size of Pettersson's original wild guess which YEC's still throw around as an authoritative figure. I'm truly surprised, after all the times this bogus argument has been beaten to death here and elsewhere on the net (even AiG publically renounced it!), that you still use it.

It's a similar set of presuppositions that suffered when the lost squadron was found. Now all we need to do is wait for the "adjustment."

But it's you who need to change your "presuppositions". You think it snows 5' per year in Greenland's interior, where they take the ice cores from. Didn't you read any of those posts today?

[Dataman]

Sorry. It is too difficult to carry on a discussion with you. You fabricate too often. For example, just in your last post you wrote

I'm truly surprised, after all the times this bogus argument has been beaten to death here and elsewhere on the net (even AiG publically renounced it!), that you still use it.

Guess what? I didn't use it. We weren't discussing the age of the moon based on the amount of dust. We were talking about calibrating, as you put it, a "wild guess."

I would appreciate if you'd either cut back on the caffeine take some time off before you post to me again. Your nerves are shot.