[HalfFull]

So you have provided a nice model of ICR-style scholarship. Just take what's good. Whatever you do, don't say how much data you left behind on the discard heap.

Your side, however, just takes what they think is bad, automatically begin calling respected researchers names because they cannot refute the this study. We have caught on to your game.

In this particular accusation (unrelated article, with multiple authors of unknown contributions) , you automatically assume the worst without even knowing all the facts. There are many possible explanations of why his nane is no longer on the article...of course you and prof just call him names...typical.

Of course, real facts of this particular thread (intrinsic C14 in fossils) remains unrefuted, in spite of all the smoke you and Mr. Prof are blowing.

[VadeRetro]

Your side, however, just takes what they think is bad, automatically begin calling respected researchers names because they cannot refute the this study.

Caught out in a pathetic flim-flam, you hurl accusations.

The old-earth study of which Baumgardner is listed as a co-author in every case but one requires no refutation of which I am aware. His YEC model is a joke.

[ThinkPlease]

Your side, however, just takes what they think is bad, automatically begin calling respected researchers names because they cannot refute the this study. We have caught on to your game.

Do you read ANY scientific journals? I mean REALLY read them? Just curious.