Yep, looks like they've lost the argument already, insults to the fore. I wonder how long these guys will take to get this thread pulled? In any case, no one seems to have a credible explanation for the excess carbon-14. It is a puzzler. Cosmic rays can't do it. They have already been eliminated because of the atmosphere. Neutrinos? The scientific arena has definitely become a hotbed for modern debate (approaching watershed proportions). These studies are coming out like gangbusters, and it seems the secular papers are beginning to agree more often with the other side.
The scientific arena has definitely become a hotbed for modern debate (approaching watershed proportions). These studies are coming out like gangbusters, and it seems the secular papers are beginning to agree more often with the other side.
Huh. You must read different journals than I do. I've never seen anything like that in the 3-4 journals I skim through online. Certainly nothing approaching a creationist paper (unless you want to call Arp a creationist, in which case he'd yell at you).