To: bondserv
That guy simply heckles science. It's all anyone needs to know about creationism.
You need more content for your "real science" than a count of every "maybe," reference to error of measurement, phenomenon explained by competing theories, or caveat applied to a statement in mainstream science.
To: VadeRetro
That guy simply heckles science. It's all anyone needs to know about creationism.You need more content for your "real science" than a count of every "maybe," reference to error of measurement, phenomenon explained by competing theories, or caveat applied to a statement in mainstream science.
I would say you are his mirror image on the evolutionary side. I am sure your posts here would fluster him as well.
To: VadeRetro
You need more content for your "real science" than a count of every "maybeSince evolution "science" is full of "could-of's", "probably's" and "perhaps", it probably would have been better for you to find another definition for your brand of science, Vade.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson