Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: narby
"The contamination Vade is talking about is rain."


I guess that means carbon dating is useless then, or was there no rain contamination before now?
114 posted on 09/25/2003 4:15:35 PM PDT by MontanaBeth (USA-its enemies are my enemies-foreign or domestic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]


To: MontanaBeth
Back to about 50K, the decay curve sticks up out of the noise floor. I'm surprised the two geologists you claim to have worked for didn't mention how carbon dating works and how little relation it bears to the age of the earth.
116 posted on 09/25/2003 4:18:02 PM PDT by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies ]

To: MontanaBeth
I guess that means carbon dating is useless then, or was there no rain contamination before now?

Rain caused carbon to be deposited in rock layers. It is not so much that you can't use carbon dating for relativly recent samples, but it does create a base noise floor (a minimum 14C amount) in all samples.

One of the previous posts from HalfFull quoted the article saying ther should be a zero amount of 14C in very old samples. But this is false.

118 posted on 09/25/2003 4:21:01 PM PDT by narby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson