To: Amelia
As I see it, you are confessing to being beguiled by the pro-abortion media.
I don't have to prove that Butcher(Lets not insult a profession dedicated to the preservation of life-Dr. indeed!) Britton would not have been there that day, had his accomplices not been there. Britton was there to deny babies the right to life that their conception had promised them-that was the disgusting profession that had made him the millions that he left behind for others. You may be right, Britton's greed may have overuled his sense of survival-greed is an ugly thing.
I don't care what the news report said! Hill laid down his gun for the sake of the police officer-not himself. There are so many off duty cops defending the right of abortionists to slaughter the innocent, that Hill had every reason to believe the Cop would blow him away irregardless. If cops defend the murderers of babies-what reason did Hill have to believe they would spare him-disarmed or not??????
537 posted on
09/06/2003 3:20:54 PM PDT by
F.J. Mitchell
(Our enemies within are very slick, but slime is always treacherously slick, isn't it?)
To: F.J. Mitchell
As I see it, you are confessing to being beguiled by the pro-abortion media. Odd how suddenly 90% of FReepers are pro-abortion in your mind.
You notice I was willing to grant that there might be something to the argument that killing Dr. Britton in defense of unborn babies met the definition of justifiable homicide. I still don't think that the Barretts were an immediate threat to anyone's life, however.
I don't care what the news report said! Hill laid down his gun for the sake of the police officer-not himself.
Hill said himself he put his gun down so that maybe they wouldn't shoot him.
I say again: He was willing to kill for his cause, but he wasn't willing to die for it that day.
540 posted on
09/06/2003 4:01:46 PM PDT by
Amelia
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson