[MHGinTN]

You asserted, in your post directed at me, "However, you and others attacked me because I had sympathy for the children of Dr. Britton ..." No, I have done no such thing. You then try to ascribe to me a specious comment you constructed as a strawman(for reasons that escape me, if you're actually wishing to have an honest exchange), "I suppose the children shouldn't have even been bothered by the fact their father was murdered in cold blood, since he was evil." Britton's children are not abortionists, as far as I know, and I have not referred to them to the best of my recollection. [Incidentally, Paul was a Pharisee, and you could be less obtuse if you wish to insult people on this forum.]

You appear to prefer baiting inference and innuendo over direct dialog, so this 'Christian' will eschew further exchanges with you.

[Amelia]

Britton's children are not abortionists, as far as I know, and I have not referred to them to the best of my recollection.

If you'll take the time to read back on the thread, woahhs and I were having a 'discussion' in which he seemed to be asserting that the family members of abortionists were either evil as well, or shouldn't have been worried about their evil family member being killed.

My first contact with you on this thread, IIRC, occured when you jumped in with the statement "If a family member of mine performed abortions and I found out, I would disown that individual and never lay eyes on them again in my lifetime so long as it were possible ..." - you seemed to be agreeing with woahhs' opinion of the family members.

I then asked you if you thought abortionists were beyond redemption, which you declined to answer, saying it was off-topic.

Incidentally, Paul was a Pharisee,

Paul was a Pharisee, when he called himself Saul and before he met Jesus on the road to Damascus.

You appear to prefer baiting inference and innuendo over direct dialog, so this 'Christian' will eschew further exchanges with you.

Perhaps just as well.