[wideawake]

Whoa! What Luis did was quote your statement after each of the other statements you had offered that hang as inconsistent with the repeated statement.

I strenuously disagree.

Absolutely none of the statements of mine he quoted dealt with the results of actions, but with either the motives of actions or the first principles upon which those motives were based.

I assure you, Luis is quite capable of discerning motive and action. And years of reading his posts prove beyond any doubt that he is quite capable of discussing an issue coherently ... in fact, his surgical precision often leaves a field of comments chopped into the incoherencies rife in the bunch.

I'm sure that Luis is capable of discussing issues coherently, discerning motive from action, etc.

But for some reason he has chosen not to exercise those abilities with respect to my last few posts.

All he has to do in order to demonstrate an incoherence in my argument is to logically show how defending oneself or others is morally equivalent to attacking others.

[Luis Gonzalez]

"I strenuously disagree."

With everyone except yourself...or so it seems.

Now you're entering the Bill Clinton universe in parsing to meet your needs.

Hill committed murder, he's dead because of it. Condemned by both man's law and God's Word...that you would draw a comparision between Hill and St. Peter is absurd.