Replies

So then, he should have continued into the building and killed his receptionist, and his accountant, and maybe his janitor.

Then, he should have found the abortionist's medical supplies salesman and killed them, as well as his attorney, and even the people who sold him his Yellow Pages ad.

Hill could have kept going until he actually killed the members of SCOTUS.

This does not follow logically from what I said.

Using deadly force against someone who is about to murder someone is one thing, using deadly force against people who are not directly committing the act or physically preventing others from stopping the act is completely different.

Once again, you are confusing punitive action with preventive action.

Just doing God's work Paul Hill.

That's debatable. But unlike some, he was probably trying to.

I bet you that's not whose eyes he's looking into right now.

I'm not in the habit of wagering on the eternal damnation of others. It's an unChristian undertaking.

"Using deadly force against someone who is about to murder someone is one thing."

So, you are claiming that the body guard assisted in the performance of abortions?

Or are you saying that the body guard had more complicity than the receptionist who scheduled the procedure, the salesman who sold the tools of the trade, or the bookkeeper who helped the business stay open?

All you are trying to do is to condone the act of murder while simultaneously condemning the act of murder.