I thought it was a good question, for those who think Paul Hill did the right thing - if what he was doing was right, why are not more "principled" pro-lifers doing the same?
The two possible answers I can see are that (1)what he did WAS NOT right, and (2) they are keyboard warriors without the courage of their convictions.
We can also argue that Paul Hill's actions, while morally right, did not have the desired results (in fact, perhaps the opposite) and therefore were poor strategy.
Please note that I am NOT trying to encourage anyone to go out and commit murder, just trying to understand the thinking here.
The two possible answers I can see are that (1)what he did WAS NOT right, and (2) they are keyboard warriors without the courage of their convictions. I can easily infer from your tone and wording that you do not believe abortion doctors are doing something wrong and that you hold pro-lifers in derision. Is that the nuance you wish to convey with your mockery?