To: Polycarp
You couldn't just deplore Hill and leave it at that, could you? Why the need to use the "on the one hand..but"...type of arguments that fanatics and supporters of lowlife cop and abortion killers use unless PART of you approves of their actions?
Why try to square the circle?
To: habs4ever
Why try to square the circle?I think they call that situational ethics.
Good post. ;-)
39 posted on
09/04/2003 9:11:55 AM PDT by
Scenic Sounds
("Don't mind people grinnin' in your face." - Son House)
To: habs4ever
I am neither advocating killing abortionists nor civil rebellion.
I'm simply telling you schmucks that violence begets violence, and as long as you tolerate the violence of "legal" abortion expect to see more violence like Hill's and eventually the violence of civil rebellion.
40 posted on
09/04/2003 9:13:46 AM PDT by
Polycarp
(PRO-LIFE--without exception, without compromise, without apology.)
To: habs4ever
He tries to square the circle so he can talk out of both sides of his mouth. This way, he can be a bridge bthe chasm between nutbags and the rest of society.
Its kind of like being an American Renaissance member, and saying "while I deplore acts of violence and racism, I can't help but notice the correctness of some of their views on culture, blah, blah, blah...."
It is a shell game, and mighty sick.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson