Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Sabertooth
He's been a candidate less than a week, you've been here less than two days, and today you're posting an article about how you have "slowly come to the conclusion" that you are "now behind Arnold."

Arnold's candidacy has been in the collective concious since before the recall even started. There was even a cover story in Vanity Fair was a few months ago about Arnold being the next Governor of California. So it is really disingenuous to insinuate that he just popped up out of nowhere 2 weeks ago. Just as it is disingenuous to insinuate as I gave my very first thoughts to politics the day I joined this forum.

The whole reason why I am behind Arnold now is only in part due to his impressive popularity. The main reason is because he is the only Republican who will not do harm to Republicans by winning.

These ideas that Arnold may dilute the pool coming from the "true conservatives" is nonsense. I'd rather have "RINOs" voting for Republicans than have them as Democrats voting against them. Period. And besides, the religious-right could use a little counter-balance anyways.

Maybe then some of the electable candidates could make it out of the Republican primaries.

44 posted on 08/12/2003 10:41:14 AM PDT by DrMartinVonNostrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: DrMartinVonNostrand
I may be wrong, but you and this essay smell fishy to me. Not sure if you're a retread, a shill, or both, but that's the way it appears to me.

If at some point I'm persuaded otherwise, I'll apologize.


52 posted on 08/12/2003 10:50:35 AM PDT by Sabertooth (Where do Arnold and McClintock stand on California Drivers' Licenses for Illegal Aliens?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

To: DrMartinVonNostrand
Well...except for the fact that yesterday you were pulling for McClintock.

As of now I have you marked more an "anti-conservative" than a "Republican at any cost", but clearly you share the viewpoints of one of the two.
75 posted on 08/12/2003 11:07:00 AM PDT by Maelstrom (To prevent misinterpretation or abuse of the Constitution:The Bill of Rights limits government power)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

To: DrMartinVonNostrand
The main reason [I favor Arnold] is because he is the only Republican who will not do harm to Republicans by winning.

Huh?

110 posted on 08/12/2003 12:47:17 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

To: DrMartinVonNostrand
Welcome, friend!

Your analysis is appreciated, and it is well-reasoned.

I agree with your conclusions, but even if I didn't, your contribution adds positively to the discussion.

Since I've met Arnold, I can assure you that your impressions of his persona and his impact on the Republican party will make all Warrior FReepers - the kind who understand how to win and hold power - very proud to call him friend.
127 posted on 08/12/2003 1:43:02 PM PDT by Stallone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

To: DrMartinVonNostrand
The Constitution protects everyone, or it protects no one.

Like those 40 million or so little Americans who didn't have the good fortune to have escaped the birth canal before their loving parents and their 'Doktors' sucked them to pieces?

No, I know--you and Ah-nuld didn't mean them...

Actually, you and Mr. Schwarzenegger are in all likelihood a very good fit for one another.

132 posted on 08/12/2003 1:53:27 PM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

To: DrMartinVonNostrand
Don't show your anti-Christian bias. The religious right has ENOUGH counter balance, thank you very much. Your argument was good unti you saidthat ....idiocy.
174 posted on 08/12/2003 3:04:01 PM PDT by Ann Archy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson