[EternalVigilance]

I have pointed out a whole range of issues that Schwarzenegger holds that are, or should be, anathema to Republicans--not just the fact that he is pro-death.

As to losing nags, it all depends on what you consider to be 'winning'. Electing liberals doesn't qualify, at least to me.

Good evening.

[onyx]

Way back in this thread I asked you to provide a link or proof of any verifable kind, to your odious claim that Arnold is pro-gay marriage!

I am still waiting!

[F16Fighter]

"I have pointed out a whole range of issues that Schwarzenegger holds that are, or should be, anathema to Republicans--not just the fact that he is pro-death."

And Ahh-nold's pro-liberal positions regarding pro-liberal issues which are rightly pointed out are all apparently white-washed and superceded all that really matters: The Big (R).

And I used to wonder about the massive psychotic hypnoses of Democrats...

[Amelia]

As to losing nags, it all depends on what you consider to be 'winning'. Electing liberals doesn't qualify, at least to me.

True. And if the GOP vote is split too many ways, electing liberals is what will happen.

I guess the questions one would have to ask would be first, could a "true conservative" be elected in California? I'd suspect the answer is no, but I could be wrong...the next question would be, how conservative could one be and still get elected?