With the length of those teeth on your image, you can jump on anyone you wish. My problem with the analysis is that the writer claimed that the Articles of Impeachment for the Felon were weak. Huh? Are perjury, jury tampering and lying to the Grand Jury weak arguments for such an indictment?
As for CA politics, the RATS are bound to nullify the recall by any means possible, including through the machinations of the infamous liberal 9th Circuit Court of Appeals. Your take?
The Articles of Impeachment WERE weak. Otherwise he would have been FOUND GUILTY in the Senate.
For a man who conspired with Communists, committed murder, and was in the mob, I would say LYING is a pretty weak charge. Sorry that you disagree.