Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: VadeRetro; RadioAstronomer
But over the equator is where the satelites would be at the 22,000 mile mark, or thereabouts, but above the equator the satelites would have to be a little closer to the earth?

Correct, or am I Just looking at it totally wrong?
2,392 posted on 08/10/2003 7:28:09 PM PDT by Aric2000 (If the history of science shows us anything, it is that we get nowhere by labeling our ignorance god)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2389 | View Replies ]


To: Aric2000
Googling around, I blundered into this website: Geosynchronous Orbit.
2,393 posted on 08/10/2003 7:42:45 PM PDT by PatrickHenry (Just say no to trolls!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2392 | View Replies ]

To: Aric2000; RadioAstronomer
Found a good web page on the topic.

Here are two example orbits, one geosynchronous and one geostationary.

The geostationary is circular and right on the equator. The geosynchronous is circular and inclined. Both include the center of the earth. No stable orbit will let you hover over a pole. There is such a thing as a polar orbit, but it crosses both poles.

As such, there is only one geostationary orbit—a belt circling the earth's equator at an altitude of roughly 35,786 kilometers.

2,394 posted on 08/10/2003 7:48:49 PM PDT by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2392 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson