No it is not. There are many modes of proof, and it has different meanings in different situations - in math, in courts, in science. Science is able to give some pretty strong proofs and that is why you and others have tried to evade the question I asked. It would look pretty foolish to deny that the Earth goes round the sun or that a parent's genes are the source of the child's. Another question that could be asked is how could science possibly have reaped such benefits to our lives if it was false?
It also seems very contradictory to me for evolutionists to say that evolution is a scientific fact and then say that science does not prove anything.
Perhaps an example would be helpful.