[jennyp]

These were your words from your recent posts. You claimed I was:

• "blaming capitalism and God for Marxism" (huh?)
• "defending Marxism" (ridiculous)
• "putting all [my] faith in a Marxist" (I'm the one putting their faith in Pannehoek???)
• "tak[ing] to heart" the rest of his article (IOW analyzing the quote in its context)
• "drool[ing] over their dogma, seeking to find something anti-conservative" (riduculous)

You were obviously calling me a Marxist. Your response now is:

au contraire!

I said you embrace the same dogma that Marx embraced.

Either "the same dogma that Marx embraced" refers to Marxism, in which case you're denying the very words you said actually exist, or you're trying to spin this as meaning that I embrace evolution, a "dogma" which Marx also embraced. Either way it's painfully obvious that that's not what you said nor meant. You meant that I was embracing Marxism, pure and simple.

You have now abandoned even the appearance of intellectual honesty.

[ALS]

Speaking of intellectual DISHONESTY, I see you conveniently left out all your posts I was referring to. That finds YOU in violation of making accusations without providing evidence.