Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: VadeRetro; RadioAstronomer; gore3000; AndrewC; PatrickHenry; longshadow; Right Wing Professor; ...
Hi all (pinging on request of RWP),

My sweetheart visited me the last couple of nights--amazing what a sweetheart can do to squish out anger and frustration. :-)

So, I've decided to go ahead and ignore the people who will not change... you know who they are... and to try to focus on people who can, hopefully, be responsive and have the capacity to disagree or agree... Yes, it's the 9th, but I'm not going to agree to the agreement until this post is finished.

VadeRetro: Now, you've got a great sense of humor and your scientific knowledge is impleccable. But, you've been letting ALS get to you way too much. Lurking on other threads, I saw at least one thread completely unrelated to science where you and ALS engaged in fistcuffs. You know that the only reason ALS is here is not for debate, but to engage in flamewars... AKA, he's a self-admitted disruptor. Just relax a little bit, okay? :-)

Gore3000: You're not an intentional liar, so won't bring up the exact threads--because you'll know what I mean. But, for goodness' sake, can you please adhere to giving information when you make allegations against other posters?

I.E., "you are an atheist, not a Christian, and that is self-evident in all your posts." That's a very serious judgement to make--and you should link to other threads & posts when you make those judgements against CobaltBlue & Junior, and so forth. You did a very good job of backing yourself up with PH.

And, the reason why you get old stuff brought up against you over and over has everything to do with that you will never admit to even the most glaring mistakes... instead, you will run away if you know you're wrong. That's wrong, period, and does nothing for your side. Everyone makes mistakes, typos, etc.

In particular, it has been disgraceful how you treated RadioAstronomer... he's too gracious to bring it up against you, but the way you pulled the 'if you don't believe hawking's theory of multiple universes, then you're either not an astronomer and liar' and ran away when it was pointed that there was no such thing as the Hawking theory of multiple universes. That only makes you look prideful and makes all Christians look bad. And, no, insults are not self-evident... back them all up no matter how self-evident you think they are, please... and, well, you were the one told to knock off personal attacks. Not RadioAstronomer. Not Junior. Not CobaltBlue. Not PatrickHenry (recently if at all, anyway). And I'm willing to bet that JR & his mods are actually YECs or ID'ers, not atheist evos.

And, not to mention you never responded when R-A asked you to back up the accusation that he was throwing insults, more than once, on the peace discussion thread. I hope you will do the right thing and either publicly apologize or FreepMail RA with an apology. Yes, the agreement says to forgive & forget any trepasses committed against the self, but it would be in the spirit of the agreement to apologize for old trepasses.

I forgive any trepasses against me, (which have been none) but I will not forget any glaring trepasses that you make against other posters without apologizing. And I will call on you every time you break the agreement and refuse to admit error, or refuse to back up your serious accusations of being a liar, not a Christian, or whatever. How hard can it be to say "I'm sorry, I thought Hawkings was the one who invented the theory of multiple universes"?

AndrewC: I don't remember the exact words I wrote, but I was being just plain bratty in the circuit chips thread. That was wrong of me, and I apologize.

There are other posters on both the evo side & crevo side and some much worse, but bringing them into this rant will be as futile as convincing Jim Robinson to change the site to SocialistRepublic.com. Anyway, that's all of the steam--significantly weakened by cuddling with the sweetie--so if anyone has any disagreements with me specifically, I will be willing to apologize. Just let me know!
1,970 posted on 08/09/2003 6:45:24 AM PDT by Nataku X (Never give Bush any power you wouldn't want to give to Hillary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1957 | View Replies ]


To: Nakatu X
Lurking on other threads, I saw at least one thread completely unrelated to science where you and ALS engaged in fistcuffs.

Hah! Where's the proof of that! Got any links? </parody mode>

(It was the "Why Was TLBSHOW Banned?" thread, pulled within a few hours of the exchange you recall. A waste of time, yes.)

1,971 posted on 08/09/2003 7:07:52 AM PDT by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1970 | View Replies ]

To: Nakatu X
My sweetheart visited me the last couple of nights--amazing what a sweetheart can do to squish out anger and frustration.

If, after a couple of nights, she's caused you to post something like that, you've got an amazing sweetheart there. All your points are well-taken.

1,972 posted on 08/09/2003 8:03:56 AM PDT by PatrickHenry (Everything good that I have done, I have done at the command of my voices.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1970 | View Replies ]

To: Nakatu X
AndrewC: I don't remember the exact words I wrote, but I was being just plain bratty in the circuit chips thread. That was wrong of me, and I apologize.

Thanks for the apology, but there was really nothing for which you needed to apologize. You were defending a subject about which you cared and had knowledge. Now, I may disagree with a particular item you consider in your arena, but that passes no judgement on you. I do not remember that you were bratty. That dubious "honor" goes to others, the which are forgotten until the resurrection of old ghosts. Your deportment was not abusive in any way. Thanks again for your apology. I likewise should apologize, if I caused you to think I was attacking you or your profession(genetic programming?). I was not. I was questioning the hyperbole associated with a particular article. I apologize if I was not clear.

1,975 posted on 08/09/2003 8:53:11 AM PDT by AndrewC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1970 | View Replies ]

To: Nakatu X
I wish you cuddles with your wonderful sweetheart every day! Thank you for your constructive attitude! Hugs!!!
1,979 posted on 08/09/2003 10:12:33 AM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1970 | View Replies ]

To: Nakatu X
Thank you so much. You honor me. :-)
1,987 posted on 08/09/2003 10:59:06 AM PDT by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1970 | View Replies ]

To: Nakatu X; Alamo-Girl
Gore3000: You're not an intentional liar, so won't bring up the exact threads-

Seems you woke up early today with the express intent of breaking the agreement you made less than 48 hours ago. One part of the agreement was to not to bring up old stuff. You have broken that in spades. Another part of the agreement was that if you bring up a charge against someone you will substantiate it.

I substantiated, completely and fully my charges against Patrick Henry Post# 1377 of the Draft Agreement thread

I shall expect an apology for that and I shall also expect YOU to backup your charges against me.

1,990 posted on 08/09/2003 11:21:29 AM PDT by gore3000 (Intelligent people do not believe in evolution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1970 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson