Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Nick Danger
I suggest learning to better hide your poisonous hostility towards women.

Most women are not so stupid as to find this alluring, attractive, or any indication of a man behind the words.

Real men LIKE women, and for a good many things other than sex.
71 posted on 07/17/2003 4:58:36 AM PDT by Ta Wee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]


To: Ta Wee
I suggest learning to better hide your poisonous hostility towards women.

Although you're not addressing me, I find your comments entertaining in they are far removed from any logical and reasoned discussion of the topic at hand, but instead are repeated attacks on this persons character. You, from my observations, have a 'poisonous hostility' that you don't 'hide' very well toward dealing with facts that you many not like.

Most women are not so stupid as to find this alluring, attractive, or any indication of a man behind the words.

Your assumption that the poster you're addressing is seeking to be 'attractive' to 'most' women when that is clearly not his objective here. Most voting women have proven themselves unattractive to men interested in preserving our Republic and our families.

Real men LIKE women, and for a good many things other than sex.

Real men love their family, and will do whatever it takes to provide and protect his family no matter how politically incorrect sounding it may be.

79 posted on 07/17/2003 7:16:35 AM PDT by disclaimer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

To: Ta Wee
Most women are not so stupid as to find this alluring, attractive, or any indication of a man behind the words.

I appreciate the advice. You need to understand that I'm new at this. In my day there was no such thing as trying to find dates on the Internet. We didn't even have the Internet. I had to learn to get my way with the wenches using charm, wit, and my good looks. But that all seems so... Twentieth Century now.

There are several women around this forum who know me personally from various Freep events around the country. They will tell you that I am not only charming and witty, I genuinely like women... and for all the right reasons. In fact they'll tell you that if I wasn't such a pot-bellied old fart, they'd think I was pretty cool. But I wasn't always a pot-bellied old fart. There was a time when, if I hit the 19th Street bars on Friday night and came home empty, it was because of a mistake.

If by 9:30 I already know that this woman has a cat, and that her father was a Marine drill sergeant who always wanted a boy, it's nobody's fault but mine if I'm still sitting there talking to her at 11. Sometimes we men get distracted, and forget we're on a mission.

But you're right, this Internet thing throws me. Especially after that Classy Blue-eyed Redhead turned out to be a 300-pound sex offender named Bruno. Say what you want about singles bars, you can spot the 300-pound sex offenders (and the 300-pound single women) from 100 yards away, and go for the blonde goddess instead. At least that was the plan I always followed.

So you don't think the civilization is at risk from all these feminist-inspired legal triumphs, eh? I do. I don't know whether to laugh or cry when, as is happening more frequently now, I see young men coming into these threads saying, "Yep. That's exactly how it is. No frigging way am I getting married. Not these days."

I was ranting about this eight or ten years ago. At that time, nobody believed it, and nobody wanted to hear it. To me it's simple economics. Raise the price of marriage to men, and fewer men will want it. Raise it some more, and then some more, and then some more, and you will see a "social phenomenon" of young men avoiding marriage like the plague. And I was condemned as a nut for saying this.

Well, here we are, years later, with the women's rags full of "Why won't men commit?" articles, and ever-larger numbers of young men obviously refusing to play "Human Society". And of course these young men are condemned as irresponsible and immature and so on. But they are doing exactly what any economist would expect the hypothetical "rational man" to do when presented with a transaction that is horribly skewed against them. They choose not to enter into the transaction.

So do I feel like the Great Karnak for seeing this coming? No. I'm saddened to see it come true. Because it means my civilization is going to fall over. For a lot of reasons, this system will not change, except to become even more onerous towards men. It is a vicious circle, and the one thing I am certain it will not end in is a nation of stable, two-parent families raising children.

I look around the world, and I don't see any serious civilization that has not adopted lifelong pair-bonding with two-parent families raising children as their basic social unit. The Indians, the Chinese, the Arabs, the Japanese, the Persians, the Western Europeans... all these hugely different cultures with different traditions and different religious beliefs... all adopted the same basic structure for raising their young. Can we find other systems in the world? Sure. But this tribe lives in the bushes, that one herds camels in the desert... these are the people who never made it out of the grass hut stage of development.

Nowhere on this Earth is there an example of a successful culture with serious accomplishments where children are raised by women, while men send them money in the mail. If it's ever been tried before, those people are gone now. They're extinct. Then I look the fertility rates in Western countries. They're below the replacement rate, in many cases by a lot. So we're becoming extinct. And I post rants about this.

And to you this sounds like I hate women. Instead of futzing up this thread with your personal injuries, and individual examples of 'he done her wrong,' how about lifting your sights a bit... above youself, above what happened to your friend Suzie, and look at the big picture for a change. Your culture is going out of business. Do you care?


116 posted on 07/17/2003 2:08:03 PM PDT by Nick Danger (The liberals are slaughtering themselves at the gates of the newsroom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

To: Ta Wee
"I suggest learning to better hide your poisonous hostility towards women."

With all due respect, you seem to have your own issues going in the other direction. Your posts make it quite apparent that you are projecting your own bias.


132 posted on 07/18/2003 7:23:46 AM PDT by Joe Brower ("There is no amount of money Congress cannot outspend." -- Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

To: Ta Wee
"I suggest learning to better hide your poisonous hostility towards women."

What about your poisonous hostility towards men?
159 posted on 07/18/2003 3:19:57 PM PDT by Darksheare ("A predator's eyes are always in front.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson