To: Nick Danger
That's a lot of verbiage to confirm my very point.
What sane woman would want to listen to all of this? As sick as I am of FEMALE 'victims', MALE 'victims' are even more pathetic.
41 posted on
07/16/2003 11:23:00 AM PDT by
Ta Wee
To: Ta Wee
What sane woman would want to listen to all of this? I assume that we are to take that as a warning that if we would like any more of your scintillating company, we should shut up and talk about what you want.
I've noted your objection in the log.
51 posted on
07/16/2003 2:32:13 PM PDT by
Nick Danger
(The liberals are slaughtering themselves at the gates of the newsroom)
To: Ta Wee; Nick Danger
What you are failing to see is that this is not victimology - it's sociology. Nick is not whining about his lot in life - he's not even making it personal or anecdotal.
What he is saying, better than the author I should add, is that men are better men when they have something to work for. And that thing which motivates their work, primarily, is their progeny. But when society, through burdensome taxation and feminized family courts, routinely strip men not only of their progeny but also the wealth they obtain from their hard work, men will cease behaving in ways that benefit society.
I've seen it in my life many times - give a man a feeling of self-worth and he'll take charge and produce remarkable things. Remove his sense of self-worth and he will stop caring about what happens. Eventually, the women will seize control, complain about how worthless the men are, and produce something inferior to what the men would have done.
Women, on the other hand, have had centuries of experience learning how to manipulate the system without doing the work - they could browbeat the men into doing their bidding so long as they left the facade that the men were still in control. Today's women (encouraged by feminism) are tearing down the facade. They want to rule. They want to control the boardroom, the bedroom and the government and they want there to be no question as to who is running the show.
It's their fatal mistake. Because, as they strip away the things men strive for, they erode the very foundations that built the boardroom, bedroom and government. What will they replace it with when the men will no longer do the work? That might be where society take us in the next generation or two.
69 posted on
07/17/2003 1:51:37 AM PDT by
Tall_Texan
(http://righteverytime.blogspot.com - home to Tall_Texan's new column.)
To: Ta Wee
You don't even bother to argue the points raised in the article, thus your case is utterly unconvincing.
87 posted on
07/17/2003 8:19:31 AM PDT by
=Intervention=
(White devils for Sharpton Central Florida chapter)
To: Ta Wee
The point you make, and prove by your very words and actions, is that women have been conditioned and trained to be light in their thinking and act without thinking.
Your words sound more like a liberal's than a conservative's.
Besides, if I constantly denigrated you and insulted you, wouldn't YOU have a reason to be upset about it?
I held open a door for two esteemed young brainwashed examples of today's young women.
They screamed that I was sexually harrassing them merely by HOLDING THE DOOR OPEN for them.
So I slammed it in their whining snotty nosed faces.
Which they deserved.
IF you enjoy polite society, then you should thank traditional values instead of feminism.
Traditional feminism brought you nothing more than the lie that sex without rules and regrets is fine, and that dressing like a prostitute doesn't make you one.
155 posted on
07/18/2003 2:57:31 PM PDT by
Darksheare
("A predator's eyes are always in front.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson