Replies

The 5th column has actively pursued the destruction of American society through an indoctrination of generations of women AND men that they males are primitive, violent, dishonest, untrustworthy and ultimately unnecessary in the family by providing economic security and raising their biological children.

Talk about learning something ugly the hard way... when I was young you could not have convinced me in a million years that a mere media-driven propaganda fest could cause such changes. To me it seemed obvious that men and women were on this planet together, and we had figured out how to make that work. Here we were and doing pretty well. There were billions of people now. We had electricity... flush toilets... amazing machines that whisked us around at 70 mph. We didn't have to worry about tigers jumping out of the bushes at us. Humans were doing pretty well.

Could women be taught to hate men? It sounded preposterous. People promoting such a thing would be fighting biology. They'd be fighting the evidence all around us that we've come a long way together. Naww, it'll never happen.

But it did happen. It actually worked. A depressing number of women have no clue what they sound like anymore. They're bigots. Kind-hearted bigots... bigots who care. But bigots nevertheless. It's way down in there... they don't even see it. Aside from the shriekers, it's not even in anything they say. It's in the assumptions that underlie what they say.

Men are sub-human. Men do not matter as individuals or as human beings. Are their young being taken from them as if men were animals? They should shut up and stop whining about that. They can and should be pushed aside, while still being there to hold everything up.

How does one get to a place in one's head where the horror of that is not immediately apparent? There's only one way: by dehumanizing them. By thinking of men as not really being human. Sixty or seventy per cent of women think like this now, and an amazing number of men have bought into it as well.

I hear this stuff and it thoroughly saddens me. It's hard to see how a society comes back from this without going through some gut-wrenching trauma to cleanse it out. Some very evil people did this, but it's done now. It's taken on a life of its own. The Grand Cooperation that took humans from the trees to the Moon is falling apart all around us. It's all 'competition' and 'me, me, me', and 'my government will squash you subhumans like a bug.'

I'm not surprised anymore that we never went on to Mars. Or even went back to the Moon. Striving for Big Things? That's what men do. And there's almost no point to it anymore. Get by, have fun, and stay away from the buzzsaw. That's the plan.

I hear this stuff and it thoroughly saddens me. It's hard to see how a society comes back from this without going through some gut-wrenching trauma to cleanse it out. Some very evil people did this, but it's done now. It's taken on a life of its own. The Grand Cooperation that took humans from the trees to the Moon is falling apart all around us. It's all 'competition' and 'me, me, me', and 'my government will squash you subhumans like a bug.'

I'm not surprised anymore that we never went on to Mars. Or even went back to the Moon. Striving for Big Things? That's what men do. And there's almost no point to it anymore. Get by, have fun, and stay away from the buzzsaw. That's the plan.

I think you hit it right on the nail again. A little OT, I'm a big space buff myself and I was very miffed that we didn't go further after landing on the Moon we didn't build a moonbase and/or go to Mars. I think you're on to something here as to why. In some ways, we have have regressed, not onto in technology but culturally. If I had a time machine and some money and tools, I would find a way to abort the cultural change that happened in the 1960's. Sadly, it is only a thought experiment but it is nice to ponder.

BTW, I've been reading your stuff on Usenet by Googling it down and they are true pieces of work. BTW, are you still on Usenet?

Men are sub-human. Men do not matter as individuals or as human beings. Are their young being taken from them as if men were animals? They should shut up and stop whining about that. They can and should be pushed aside, while still being there to hold everything up.

This is a necessary step in the creation of the Almighty State. The State is a jealous god, and will tolerate no loyalty before it.

The family is more than just the parents and kids. It is an independent decision-making unit, working in coordination with the extended family, which is the original safety net. If there are working extended families, there is less need of the State as the source of benefits and protection

There are several interlocking incentive systems working against the family:

Lesbian women have an incentive for poisoning male/female relations, because this way the women who go either way are more likely to choose to go the lesbian direction
Gay men have several incentives to destroy hetero fathers: kill their incentives, and they'll be less competition for gay men in the workplace, plus a teen boy without a father in the house is easier prey for gay "chicken-hawks" (who might be concerned about being disemboweled by an angry father)
Socialists win by destroying the family, by making the women dependent on the State for collection of child-support payments, and thus more likely to vote for Socialists (AKA Democrats).