To: CobaltBlue
If Utah decided to recognize bigamous marriages, I doubt very much that Virginia would honor them. Isn't that why Utah had to give up the legality of such marriages as a precondition of statehood? I'm not certain of this, but I'm "fairly" certain.
4,057 posted on
07/17/2003 7:34:29 PM PDT by
PatrickHenry
(Idiots are on "virtual ignore," and you know exactly who you are.)
To: PatrickHenry
snatch clone new sociopolitical world order super statist worshiper placemaker !
4,059 posted on
07/17/2003 7:36:51 PM PDT by
f.Christian
(evolution vs intelligent design ... science3000 ... designeduniverse.com --- * architecture * !)
To: PatrickHenry
I think Congress was opposed to Utah becoming a state due to the bigamy issues.
As to whether there was a fear that the rest of the states would have to recognize polygamous marriages, I just don't know.
The SCOTUS hasn't taken much interest in divorce cases in many years, so for the most part the most powerful arguments are from state courts these days.
I think it's completely unheard of for Congress to take an interest in marriage, much less elevate it to constitutional status.
4,061 posted on
07/17/2003 7:40:57 PM PDT by
CobaltBlue
(Never voted for a Democrat in my life.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson