[Stultis]

you tried that lie over here:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/946313/posts?page=74#74

and got yer butt whooped

All I find in that one is Heartlander resonding with another link (#77) and VadeRetro (#84) pointing out several obvious deficiencies therein, e.g. the usual lies about the Cambrian explosion, bald denial of gene duplication, and no explaination for Archaeopteryx's reptilian characteristics.

There was no response to Vade's substantive critique. Was the "butt whooping" delivered in disappearing ink?

[PatrickHenry]

P L A C E M A R K E R (having slept through about 200 utterly worthless creationoid postings).

[ALS]

Darwinism/evolution supports and furthers Marxism/socialism, so can it also support and further conservatism?
If so, explain how/why.

Any attempt to deviate from that by you is your own dragon to slay. DO NOT attach my name to it.

http://www.marxists.org/archive/pannekoe/works/1912-dar.htm#S9

[ALS]

For the lurkers and honest observers

click the pic

[VadeRetro]

All I find in that one is Heartlander resonding with another link (#77)

Yes, there's a link there, but in typical creo fashion he also pasted the contents in-line right above the link lest anyone reading down the thread not see him citing a forbidding-looking article with tables and discussions of chemical experiments, genes, and fossils. Moreover, ALS then instantly reposted the thing onto this thread.

At least two factors compel them to act this way. One is that they're acting like the bozo in the cafeteria who sits next to you while you're eating and starts witnessing to you whether you like it or not. The other is that they really don't have much supporting data or even much of an illusion of supporting data, so any little shreds of pretense they can scrape together get paraded about and waved in faces like the bloody bedsheet from an Arab's wedding night.