Yes, a lie
I guess that's what Darwin gets for quoting a CREATIONIST, and giving credence to an anthropological doctrine devised by CREATIONISTS, and citing anthopological data collected by a CREATIONIST.
But we're supposed to ignore all that, right?, 'cause there just couldn't have been any scientific racism before Darwin. (Even though there was.)
Yes, a lie0me
I guess that's what Darwin gets for quoting a CREATIONIST
No, that's what he gets for quoting a racist. That's what he gets for quoting a LIE. That's what he gets for not being a scientist and digging up all the garbage he could from whatever source to support his racist views. His racism and that of evolution is totally indisputable - as is his not being a scientist. Seems I recall asking a few hundred posts back for an example of ONE (1) experiment in the Origins and receiving no response - as usual.