[Virginia-American]

The continual misquotes, removal of context, chopping of quotes, fake bibliographies, etc. of the Creationists does taint their other arguments

It also taints Republicans and conservatives. Guilt by association again. I don't like being involuntarily associated with liars and cheats.

Maybe the anti-evos can get Maureen Dowd to write their stuff - they have the same standards of integrity, which ALS was **defending** on one of the threads he got pulled.

[f.Christian]

Imaginary integrity -- evo character oxymoron placemaker !

[PatrickHenry]

Maybe the anti-evos can get Maureen Dowd to write their stuff - they have the same standards of integrity ...

Baghdad Bob would be a closer match.

[ALS]

"Maybe the anti-evos can get Maureen Dowd to write their stuff - they have the same standards of integrity, which ALS was **defending** on one of the threads he got pulled."

If memory serves, you were embarrassed for getting caught defending yer pal maureen.

evo-projection placemarker....

[gore3000]

Maybe the anti-evos can get Maureen Dowd to write their stuff - they have the same standards of integrity

First of all, your pinging me on this at least implies that you include me in the above slander. I suggest to you that before you can make such a claim of me you need to give proof of such, which you have not done - and cannto do. Second of all, my standards, which can be verified in numerous posts is to give a quote, almost invariably without ellipsis (and that is what that liar did) and give a link to the article. That is perfectly proper and perfectly legitimate way of posting as even your friend js1138 agrees in Post# 2764 .

Further, the above is clearly refuted in my Post# 2497 to which I might add now - how come evolutionists supposedly do not mean what they say according to you and other evos on this thread? Are evolutionist authors inveterate liars?