Is that in the link I posted?
Only evolutionists would be so arrogant and so unscientific as to claim that tons of DNA are there just to prove their theory.
Are there just to prove their theory? Who ever said that? The precise details of the dna (both coding and noncoding) support the hypothesis of common descent. At least that was the point of the artiicle I linked to.
Only evolutionists would be so contradictory of their own theory to say that 95% of DNA, replicated in almost all the 100 trillion cells of the human body is useless.
Precisley what part of what theory is contradicted here?
The concept of pseudogenes on which evolutionists have relied so much as verification of their theory has been totally disproven by REAL science.
Who? can you supply a reference or link?
Pseudogenes rest on the concept that most DNA is junk and that the junk is just the useless remains from previous evolutions.
No, pseudogenes are the remains of genes that have a mutation that destroys their usefulness. Most of the timer they're fatal, but sometimes not.
It's the fact that it was the **same mutation** that destroyed the ability to make vitamin C that gives support to the hypothesis of common ancestry of the great apes, including ourselves.
The concept was made up to prove evolutionary theory. As I say and discuss quite fully in Post# 3118 to you and Ichmeunon there is no scientific basis for it, it is an argument from ignorance. Enjoy!