To: VadeRetro
"[The theory of evolution] forms a satisfactory faith on which to base our interpretation of nature."*L. Harrison Matthews, "Introduction to Origin of Species," p. xxii (1977 edition).
"Evolution requires plenty of faith; a faith in L-proteins that defy chance formation; a faith in the formation of DNA codes which, if generated spontaneously, would spell only pandemonium; a faith in a primitive environment that, in reality, would fiendishly devour any chemical precursors to life; a faith in experiments that prove nothing but the need for intelligence in the beginning; a faith in a primitive ocean that would not thicken, but would only haplessly dilute chemicals; a faith in natural laws of thermodynamics and biogenesis that actually deny the possibility for the spontaneous generation of life; a faith in future scientific revelations that, when realized, always seem to present more dilemmas to the evolutionists; faith in improbabilities that treasonously tell two storiesone denying evolution, the other confirming the Creator; faith in transformations that remain fixed; faith in mutations and natural selection that add to a double negative for evolution; faith in fossils that embarrassingly show fixity through time, regular absence of transitional forms and striking testimony to a worldwide water deluge; a faith in time which proves to only promote degradation in the absence of mind; and faith in reductionism that ends up reducing the materialist's arguments to zero and forcing the need to invoke a supernatural Creator."R.L. Wysong, The Creation-Evolution Controversy (1981), p. 455.
"Evolution is sometimes the key mythological element in a philosophy that functions as a virtual religion."*E. Harrison, "Origin and Evolution of the Universe," Encyclopedia Britannica: Macropaedia (1974), p. 1007.
2,019 posted on
07/13/2003 7:31:22 PM PDT by
ALS
(http://designeduniverse.com Featuring original works by FR's finest . contact me to add yours!)
To: ALS
Encyclopedia Britannica: Macropaedia (1974)...Ah, the good old 1974 Britannica. That was the one where they thought it would be a good idea to have articles on Eastern Europe written by Eastern Europeans -- read Communists. I'm surprised you don't rely on the one true Britannica, the 1911 edition.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson