[gore3000]

Do you claim any of these support your claim they believe in evolution?

The point is not whether the 'scientists' who performed the above indecencies believe in evolution or not, they obviously do. The question is whether they can be called scientists and whether such a mode of conduct can be called science.

[ALS]

Obviously js1138's ill fated attempt was aimed at me and you. He tried to imply I just put up articles without reading through them. Somehow this myth was supposed to tarnish the authors, etc., blah.

Then he wanted to lay down some bogus claim in hopes no one would read it(same thing he was accusing me of.) The idea there is to make you out a dummy for not reading your own original article. What's that boy huffin'?
Aren't libs famous for hoping no one will check out their wild claims, and then along comes a conservative to set them staright?
The speed at which two other evos stuck their collective necks in the noose just goes to show that none of them read the article themselves.

The embarassment must be excruciating!