Did you EVEN bother to read my Post? I never said she didn't. You really ought to try researching things first before trying to lecture other people.
Ayn Rand got a few important things right, but her overall she was a brilliant nutjob whose views about reason and human nature are hopelessly stunted
Once again I nerver said she wasn't immmature. In fact if you even bothered to read my Post you would see that I had said............
The older I get, the more critical of her I get. She was very 'Obsessive' in a abnormal-psych way.
I'd, once again really appreciate you're properly knowing the background before you open your mouth. Liberal elitists like Clinton loved to lecture people too because THEY always knew best. I guess you fall into that catagory.
How could I not read it? You used one inch characters in red to make your point. I responded because you seemed to be claiming that a charge of alcoholism against Rand was somehow outlandish. On the contrary, her addiction to pills and her marriage to an alcoholic make the charge completely understandable, even though, as I said, she may not have consumed as much alcohol as her husband. In AA jargon, Rand was a classic enabler suffering just as severely as Frank did from the "disease" of alcoholism. Sometimes, as in Rand's case, enablers have mood altering addictions of their own.
As for the rest of the stuff you wrote, it's not worth responding to. Out of proportion hostility is a sign of a little mind.