To: MeeknMing
The War On Drugs killed Mr. Biggs. After all, if Mallard's drugs weren't illegal, she would've driven straight to the police station to help the victim get the care he needed to save his life. Instead, she was justifiably scared of being slapped with a bunch of drug charges.</sarcasm>
</doper_BS>
6 posted on
06/23/2003 2:58:12 PM PDT by
newgeezer
(Where there is demand, there will ALWAYS be supply to meet it. Thus, the supply-side WOD fails.)
To: newgeezer
Sarcasm noted. But the (user-, not dealer-level) drug charges are miniscule compared to the charges for killing this guy. The drug use may well have led to this problem, or it may not (I have almost hit kids wearing dark clothing on ill-lit streets at night while completely sober), but what she'll be punished for is hitting someone and then not taking what steps she could to save his life.
The drugs were very likely a contributing factor to her giving in to "It's all about me" instead of sacrificing her reputation in order to see that this man survived.
14 posted on
06/23/2003 3:04:51 PM PDT by
RonF
To: newgeezer
This is an alchohol problem. As drinking is so much more, so very much more intense than pot (I haven't ever done X, but I believe it is a speed high), I wouldn't even have mentioned it. A smattering of blue in a swimming pool of red.
22 posted on
06/23/2003 3:12:01 PM PDT by
KCmark
(I am NOT a partisan.)
To: newgeezer
Even better: She was perfectly able to drive because as we all know, pot makes you drive better. Therefore, the pot and alcohol cancelled each other out. Of course, the ecstasy is the wildcard.
To: newgeezer
I wuz thinkin'of that!
Her use of two illegal substances and illegal abuse of of one legal substance becomes her defense.
There will be some here on FR that will agree with that defense.
Like the Pro-Choice single agenda of many Democrat women, illegal substance abuse can never have consequenses.
If it does, it is your fault.
45 posted on
06/23/2003 3:31:26 PM PDT by
autoresponder
(. . . . SOME CAN*T HANDLE THE TRUTH . . . THE NYT ESPECIALLY!)
To: newgeezer
BS! Chante Mallard killed M. Biggs.
148 posted on
06/23/2003 6:36:51 PM PDT by
Abcdefg
To: newgeezer
The War On Drugs killed Mr. Biggs. After all, if Mallard's drugs weren't illegal, she would've driven straight to the police station to help the victim get the care he needed to save his life. Guessed you missed the part about DRANK HEAVILY. That's what caused the accident. Pot and Ecstasy did not.
160 posted on
06/23/2003 7:41:21 PM PDT by
DAnconia55
(But hey whatever lie works for you today.)
To: newgeezer; *Wod_list; jmc813
The War On Drugs killed Mr. Biggs. After all, if Mallard's drugs weren't illegal, she would've driven straight to the police station to help the victim get the care he needed to save his life. Instead, she was justifiably scared of being slapped with a bunch of drug charges.</sarcasm></doper_BS>Can you provide evidence that a drug-freedom advocate has ever made such an argument? Or is this just another Drug Warrior smear tactic?
186 posted on
06/24/2003 6:59:26 AM PDT by
MrLeRoy
(The legitimate powers of government extend to such acts only as are injurious to others. - Jefferson)
To: newgeezer
Responsible people do not drive while intoxicated.
193 posted on
06/24/2003 7:24:10 AM PDT by
jayef
To: newgeezer
'War on drugs", give me a break!
This piece of inhumane garbage killed a man, simple.
High or not, she chose to put herself and her situation
before this persons LIFE.
The drugs she was taking werent so 'situation altering'
to make her loose sight of the reality of killing someone.
Those drugs wore off within hours, what was she doing
for the next 3 days?
She and anyone actually defending her for any reason
are the trash I deplore sharing oxygen with.
273 posted on
06/25/2003 12:37:14 PM PDT by
wayneo
To: newgeezer
She was probably more concerned about the smell of alcohol on her breath.
276 posted on
06/26/2003 5:44:41 AM PDT by
sweet_diane
(Philippians 4:12-13)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson